These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24181984)

  • 21. Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.
    ELman JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jul; 70(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 7264071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect.
    Garnier M; Henrich N; Dubois D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):588-608. PubMed ID: 20008681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Principal component analysis reveals differential attentional modulation of the vocal response to pitch perturbation.
    Okazaki S; Mori K; Okada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):334-40. PubMed ID: 24993217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex.
    Liu H; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3671-7. PubMed ID: 18247774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial hearing in a child with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and bilateral cochlear implants.
    Johnstone PM; Yeager KR; Noss E
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):400-8. PubMed ID: 23586418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Walger M; von Wedel H
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 19173112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Responses to Intensity-Shifted Auditory Feedback During Running Speech.
    Patel R; Reilly KJ; Archibald E; Cai S; Guenther FH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26431217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When "okay" is not okay: acoustic characteristics of single-word prosody conveying reluctance.
    van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL13-9. PubMed ID: 23298012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Lin CY; Lin CD; Wang CY; Chung HK; Li X
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21047294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perception of spectrally degraded reflexives and pronouns by children.
    Başkent D; van Rij J; Ng ZY; Free R; Hendriks P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3844-52. PubMed ID: 24180793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of ear canal occlusion and masking on the perception of voice.
    Navarro R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 8668476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Voice aftereffects of adaptation to speaker identity.
    Zäske R; Schweinberger SR; Kawahara H
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):38-45. PubMed ID: 20430084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production.
    Jones JA; Munhall KG
    Curr Biol; 2005 Oct; 15(19):1768-72. PubMed ID: 16213825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of hearing aid amplification on voice F0 variability in speakers with prelingual hearing loss.
    Lee GS; Liu C; Lee SH
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():1-8. PubMed ID: 23648550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.