These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization. Cook LA; Van Vliet HA; Lopez LM; Pun A; Gallo MF Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; 2014(3):CD003991. PubMed ID: 24683020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vasectomy by ligation and excision, with or without fascial interposition: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN77781689]. Sokal D; Irsula B; Hays M; Chen-Mok M; Barone MA; BMC Med; 2004 Mar; 2():6. PubMed ID: 15056388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization. Cook LA; Van Vliet H; Lopez LM; Pun A; Gallo MF Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):CD003991. PubMed ID: 17443535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Male sterilization. Davis JE Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 4(4):522-6. PubMed ID: 1324023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating success of no-scalpel vasectomy by ligation and excision with fascial interposition in a large prospective study in Islamic Republic of Iran. Farrokh-Eslamlou HR; Eslami M; Abdi-Rad I; Eilkhanizadeh B East Mediterr Health J; 2011 Jun; 17(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 21796970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical aspects of vasectomies performed in the United States in 1995. Haws JM; Morgan GT; Pollack AE; Koonin LM; Magnani RJ; Gargiullo PM Urology; 1998 Oct; 52(4):685-91. PubMed ID: 9763094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition. Sokal D; Irsula B; Chen-Mok M; Labrecque M; Barone MA BMC Urol; 2004 Oct; 4(1):12. PubMed ID: 15509302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization. Cook LA; Vliet H; Pun A; Gallo MF Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD003991. PubMed ID: 15266511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recanalization rate following methods of vasectomy using interposition of fascial sheath of vas deferens. Esho JO; Cass AS J Urol; 1978 Aug; 120(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 671627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vasectomy: a guidelines-based approach to male surgical contraception. Velez D; Pagani R; Mima M; Ohlander S Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1365-1368. PubMed ID: 33879342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. State-of-the art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: VI. Male sterilisation. Michielsen D; Beerthuizen R Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2010 Apr; 15(2):136-49. PubMed ID: 20230339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vasectomy. Schmidt SS Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Feb; 14(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 3811049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vasectomy: an update. Dassow P; Bennett JM Am Fam Physician; 2006 Dec; 74(12):2069-74. PubMed ID: 17186713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A combination of check tug and fascial interposition with no-scalpel vasectomy. Kumar V; Kaza RM J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2001 Apr; 27(2):100. PubMed ID: 12457523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and complications associated with 2 vasectomy occlusion techniques. Labrecque M; Nazerali H; Mondor M; Fortin V; Nasution M J Urol; 2002 Dec; 168(6):2495-8; discussion 2498. PubMed ID: 12441948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vasectomy by section, luminal fulguration and fascial interposition: results from 6248 cases. Schmidt SS Br J Urol; 1995 Sep; 76(3):373-4; discussion 375. PubMed ID: 7551850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]