These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24183199)
1. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) health states with the time trade-off method in Taiwan. Lee HY; Hung MC; Hu FC; Chang YY; Hsieh CL; Wang JD J Formos Med Assoc; 2013 Nov; 112(11):699-706. PubMed ID: 24183199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries. Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC; Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time trade-off and ranking exercises are sensitive to different dimensions of EQ-5D health states. Rand-Hendriksen K; Augestad LA Value Health; 2012; 15(5):777-82. PubMed ID: 22867789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values? Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Liu GG; Wu H; Li M; Gao C; Luo N Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 25128053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valuation of Quality Weights for EuroQol 5-Dimensional Health States With the Time Trade-Off Method in the Capital of Iran. Goudarzi R; Sari AA; Zeraati H; Rashidian A; Mohammad K; Amini S Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():170-175. PubMed ID: 31096140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [General population time trade-off values for 42 EQ-5D health states in South Korea]. Jo MW; Lee SI J Prev Med Public Health; 2007 Mar; 40(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 17426430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L. Ramos-Goñi JM; Rand-Hendriksen K; Pinto-Prades JL Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 27325340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inconsistencies in TTO and VAS values for EQ-5D health states. Lamers LM; Stalmeier PF; Krabbe PF; Busschbach JJ Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16525171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between time trade-off and the EuroQol. Ariza-Ariza R; Hernández-Cruz B; Carmona L; Dolores Ruiz-Montesinos M; Ballina J; Navarro-Sarabia F; Arthritis Rheum; 2006 Oct; 55(5):751-6. PubMed ID: 17013822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating an EQ-5D value set for Malaysia using time trade-off and visual analogue scale methods. Yusof FA; Goh A; Azmi S Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S85-90. PubMed ID: 22265073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D health states with the time trade-off method in South Korea. Jo MW; Yun SC; Lee SI Value Health; 2008 Dec; 11(7):1186-9. PubMed ID: 18489498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Italian population-based values of EQ-5D health states. Scalone L; Cortesi PA; Ciampichini R; Belisari A; D'Angiolella LS; Cesana G; Mantovani LG Value Health; 2013; 16(5):814-22. PubMed ID: 23947975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report. Mulhern B; Bansback N; Brazier J; Buckingham K; Cairns J; Devlin N; Dolan P; Hole AR; Kavetsos G; Longworth L; Rowen D; Tsuchiya A Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 24568945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States. Burström K; Teni FS; Gerdtham UG; Leidl R; Helgesson G; Rolfson O; Henriksson M Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Aug; 38(8):839-856. PubMed ID: 32307663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Lee YK; Nam HS; Chuang LH; Kim KY; Yang HK; Kwon IS; Kind P; Kweon SS; Kim YT Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1187-93. PubMed ID: 19659703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan. Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Societal Preferences for EQ-5D Health States from a Brazilian Population Survey. Viegas Andrade M; Noronha K; Kind P; Maia AC; Miranda de Menezes R; De Barros Reis C; Nepomuceno Souza M; Martins D; Gomes L; Nichele D; Calazans J; Mascarenhas T; Carvalho L; Lins C Value Health Reg Issues; 2013 Dec; 2(3):405-412. PubMed ID: 29702778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Empirical research of measuring elderly health utility in the outskirts of Beijing by using European quality of life 5-dimensions]. Wu YQ; Liu K; Tang X; Cao Y; Wang JW; Li N; Liu JJ; Yu LP; Xu HT; Liu WJ; Wen SS; Hu YH; Li K Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Jun; 44(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 22692310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set. Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]