138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24183462)
1. Choosing the net survival method for cancer survival estimation.
Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Pokhrel A
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1123-9. PubMed ID: 24183462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing net survival estimators of cancer patients.
Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Läärä E; Pitkäniemi J
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1866-79. PubMed ID: 26707551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer net survival on registry data: use of the new unbiased Pohar-Perme estimator and magnitude of the bias with the classical methods.
Roche L; Danieli C; Belot A; Grosclaude P; Bouvier AM; Velten M; Iwaz J; Remontet L; Bossard N
Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2359-69. PubMed ID: 22961565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different approaches to estimating age standardized net survival.
Lambert PC; Dickman PW; Rutherford MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26275405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correcting bias due to missing stage data in the non-parametric estimation of stage-specific net survival for colorectal cancer using multiple imputation.
Falcaro M; Carpenter JR
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 48():16-21. PubMed ID: 28315607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of methods for calculating relative survival in population-based studies.
Rutherford MJ; Dickman PW; Lambert PC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21840284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term net survival in patients with colorectal cancer in France: an informative contribution of recent methodology.
Rollot F; Chauvenet M; Roche L; Hamza S; Lepage C; Faivre J; Bouvier AM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Oct; 56(10):1118-24. PubMed ID: 24022528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Challenges in the estimation of Net SURvival: The CENSUR working survival group.
Giorgi R;
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2016 Oct; 64(5):367-371. PubMed ID: 27793412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unbiased estimates of long-term net survival of solid cancers in France.
Jooste V; Grosclaude P; Remontet L; Launoy G; Baldi I; Molinié F; Arveux P; Bossard N; Bouvier AM; Colonna M;
Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2370-7. PubMed ID: 23001495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fair comparisons of cause-specific and relative survival by accounting for the systematic removal of patients from risk-sets.
Wells M; Rutherford MJ; Lambert PC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 86():102408. PubMed ID: 37591148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosing the relative survival method for cancer survival estimation.
Hakulinen T; Seppä K; Lambert PC
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47(14):2202-10. PubMed ID: 21549589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unbiased estimates of long-term net survival of hematological malignancy patients detailed by major subtypes in France.
Monnereau A; Troussard X; Belot A; Guizard AV; Woronoff AS; Bara S; Lapôtre-Ledoux B; Iwaz J; Tretarre B; Maynadié M;
Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2378-87. PubMed ID: 23034773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of age-standardized net survival, even when age-specific data are sparse.
Rutherford MJ; Dickman PW; Coviello E; Lambert PC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 67():101745. PubMed ID: 32554300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conditional net survival: Relevant prognostic information for colorectal cancer survivors. A French population-based study.
Drouillard A; Bouvier AM; Rollot F; Faivre J; Jooste V; Lepage C
Dig Liver Dis; 2015 Jul; 47(7):597-601. PubMed ID: 25911573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On standardized relative survival.
Sasieni P; Brentnall AR
Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):473-482. PubMed ID: 27554303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Up-to-date and precise estimates of cancer patient survival: model-based period analysis.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 164(7):689-96. PubMed ID: 16840519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informative censoring in relative survival.
Rebolj Kodre A; Pohar Perme M
Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(27):4791-802. PubMed ID: 23761182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A log-rank-type test to compare net survival distributions.
Grafféo N; Castell F; Belot A; Giorgi R
Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):760-9. PubMed ID: 26821615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Doubly robust estimator for net survival rate in analyses of cancer registry data.
Komukai S; Hattori S
Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):124-133. PubMed ID: 27479200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Material and methods.
Engholm G; Gislum M; Bray F; Hakulinen T
Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):545-60. PubMed ID: 20491523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
