303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24183553)
1. CT scan parameters and radiation dose: practical advice for radiologists.
Raman SP; Mahesh M; Blasko RV; Fishman EK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Nov; 10(11):840-6. PubMed ID: 24183553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans.
Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomography dose optimization.
Seeram E
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):655CT-671CT; quiz 672CT-675CT. PubMed ID: 25002653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm.
Silva AC; Lawder HJ; Hara A; Kujak J; Pavlicek W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 20028923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Individualized dose requirement for spiral-CT analysis of the abdomen].
Tschammler A; Kenn W; Dinkel HP; Sandstede J; Keberle M; Tschammler S
Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1123-30. PubMed ID: 16021545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT radiation dose and iterative reconstruction techniques.
Padole A; Ali Khawaja RD; Kalra MK; Singh S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):W384-92. PubMed ID: 25794087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individualized kV selection and tube current reduction in excretory phase computed tomography urography: potential for radiation dose reduction and the contribution of iterative reconstruction to image quality.
Froemming AT; Kawashima A; Takahashi N; Hartman RP; Nathan MA; Carter RE; Yu L; Leng S; Kagoshima H; McCollough CH; Fletcher JG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 23863531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new era in computed tomographic dose optimization: the impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose.
Kordolaimi SD; Argentos S; Pantos I; Kelekis NL; Efstathopoulos EP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 24270114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attenuation-based automatic kilovolt (kV)-selection in computed tomography of the chest: effects on radiation exposure and image quality.
Eller A; Wuest W; Scharf M; Brand M; Achenbach S; Uder M; Lell MM
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2386-91. PubMed ID: 24050878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT.
Noël PB; Fingerle AA; Renger B; Münzel D; Rummeny EJ; Dobritz M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1404-9. PubMed ID: 22109296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated computed tomography dose-saving algorithm to protect radiosensitive tissues: estimation of radiation exposure and image quality considerations.
Ketelsen D; Buchgeister M; Fenchel M; Schmidt B; Flohr TG; Syha R; Thomas C; Tsiflikas I; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 21934513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT in children--dose protection and general considerations when planning a CT in a child.
Sorantin E; Weissensteiner S; Hasenburger G; Riccabona M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 82(7):1043-9. PubMed ID: 22227258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Modern techniques for dose reduction in computed tomography imaging].
Morsbach F; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2013 Jul; 102(14):865-8. PubMed ID: 23823685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tube potential and CT radiation dose optimization.
Lira D; Padole A; Kalra MK; Singh S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W4-10. PubMed ID: 25539272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PET/CT and SPECT/CT dosimetry in children: the challenge to the pediatric imager.
Gelfand MJ; Lemen LC
Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 37(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 17707244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-dose abdominal CT: comparison of low tube voltage with moderate-level iterative reconstruction and standard tube voltage, low tube current with high-level iterative reconstruction.
Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Nakamura S; Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Sakai Y; Harada K; Yamashita Y
Clin Radiol; 2013 Oct; 68(10):1008-15. PubMed ID: 23796210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
