343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24183731)
1. Pelvic MRI as the "gold standard" in the subsequent evaluation of ultrasound-indeterminate adnexal lesions: a systematic review.
Anthoulakis C; Nikoloudis N
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):661-8. PubMed ID: 24183731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Guideline No. 403: Initial Investigation and Management of Adnexal Masses.
Salvador S; Scott S; Glanc P; Eiriksson L; Jang JH; Sebastianelli A; Dean E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Aug; 42(8):1021-1029.e3. PubMed ID: 32736853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [MR imaging of the pelvis in characterization of adnexal masses].
Hauth EA; Wolfgarten B; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2005 Dec; 127(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 16341980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gadolinium-DOTA enhanced MR imaging of adnexal tumors.
Thurnher S; Hodler J; Baer S; Marincek B; von Schulthess GK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(6):939-49. PubMed ID: 2229572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI, CT, and PET/CT for ovarian cancer detection and adnexal lesion characterization.
Iyer VR; Lee SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 20093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adnexal masses in the premenopausal patient.
Hall TR; Randall TC
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 58(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 25608252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Torashima M; Hatanaka Y; Harada M; Higashida Y; Takahashi M; Mizutani H; Tashiro H; Iwamasa J; Miyazaki K
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 7824738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization?
Thomassin-Naggara I; Fedida B; Sadowski E; Chevrier MC; Chabbert-Buffet N; Ballester M; Tavolaro S; Darai E
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():200-208. PubMed ID: 28668416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with pathology for indeterminate adnexal masses.
Haggerty AF; Hagemann AR; Chu C; Siegelman ES; Rubin SC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 25153677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving risk stratification of indeterminate adnexal masses on MRI: What imaging features help predict malignancy in O-RADS MRI 4 lesions?
Wong BZY; Causa Andrieu PI; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki EM; Vargas HA; Woo S
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111122. PubMed ID: 37806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Multiparametric MRI (mMRI) on the Therapeutic Management of Adnexal Masses Detected with Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS): An Interdisciplinary Management Approach.
Dirrichs T; Bauerschlag D; Maass N; Kuhl CK; Schrading S
Acad Radiol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 33293256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Masses.
Biggs WS; Marks ST
Am Fam Physician; 2016 Apr; 93(8):676-81. PubMed ID: 27175840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of O-RADS Ultrasound and O-RADS MRI for Risk Assessment of Ovarian and Adnexal Lesions.
Zhang Q; Dai X; Li W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 36722758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. O-RADS MRI score: analysis of misclassified cases in a prospective multicentric European cohort.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Belghitti M; Milon A; Abdel Wahab C; Sadowski E; Rockall AG;
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9588-9599. PubMed ID: 34041567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of 3T MRI findings for primary adnexal lesions and comparison with the final histological diagnosis.
Zhang H; Zhang GF; He ZY; Li ZY; Zhang GX
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Feb; 289(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 23934242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Poncelet E; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Guerra A; Fournier LS; Stojanovic S; Millet I; Bharwani N; Juhan V; Cunha TM; Masselli G; Balleyguier C; Malhaire C; Perrot NF; Sadowski EA; Bazot M; Taourel P; Porcher R; Darai E; Reinhold C; Rockall AG
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jan; 3(1):e1919896. PubMed ID: 31977064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic approach to adnexal masses discovered on ultrasound: the ADNEx MR scoring system.
Sadowski EA; Robbins JB; Rockall AG; Thomassin-Naggara I
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):679-695. PubMed ID: 28900696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update.
Forstner R; Thomassin-Naggara I; Cunha TM; Kinkel K; Masselli G; Kubik-Huch R; Spencer JA; Rockall A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2248-2257. PubMed ID: 27770228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. O-RADS MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance and Category-wise Malignancy Rates.
Rizzo S; Cozzi A; Dolciami M; Del Grande F; Scarano AL; Papadia A; Gui B; Gandolfo N; Catalano C; Manganaro L
Radiology; 2023 Apr; 307(1):e220795. PubMed ID: 36413127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
