112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24183734)
1. High-grade endometrial cancer: revisiting the impact of tumor size and location on outcomes.
Doll KM; Tseng J; Denslow SA; Fader AN; Gehrig PA
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24183734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The prognostic significance of lower uterine segment involvement in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative nodes.
Brown AK; Madom L; Moore R; Granai CO; DiSilvestro P
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 17157904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome and management of pathological stage I endometrial carcinoma patients with involvement of the lower uterine segment.
Phelan C; Montag AG; Rotmensch J; Waggoner SE; Yamada SD; Mundt AJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):513-7. PubMed ID: 11733964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endometrial carcinosarcomas have a different prognosis and pattern of spread compared to high-risk epithelial endometrial cancer.
Amant F; Cadron I; Fuso L; Berteloot P; de Jonge E; Jacomen G; Van Robaeys J; Neven P; Moerman P; Vergote I
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 15972232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential with nodal low-grade serous carcinoma.
Djordjevic B; Malpica A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jul; 36(7):955-63. PubMed ID: 22613998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal recurrence in grade 1 endometrial carcinoma?
Abu-Rustum NR; Chi DS; Leitao M; Oke EA; Hensley ML; Alektiar KM; Barakat RR
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 18657853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of body mass index on clinicopathologic features, surgical morbidity and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer.
Akbayır O; Corbacıoglu Esmer A; Numanoglu C; Cılesız Goksedef BP; Akca A; Bakır LV; Kuru O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1269-76. PubMed ID: 22729137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of serous carcinoma confined to the endometrium: a multi-institutional study.
Semaan A; Mert I; Munkarah AR; Bandyopadhyay S; Mahdi HS; Winer IS; Nucci MR; Hussein Y; Quershi F; Hayek K; Tabassum F; Alosh B; Schultz DS; Cote ML; Vijver KK; Morris RT; Oliva E; Ali-Fehmi R
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 Mar; 32(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 23370657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma.
Ben-Shachar I; Pavelka J; Cohn DE; Copeland LJ; Ramirez N; Manolitsas T; Fowler JM
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):487-93. PubMed ID: 15738013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective evaluation of prognostic significance of the tumor-free distance from uterine serosa in surgically staged endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Schwab KV; O'Malley DM; Fowler JM; Copeland LJ; Cohn DE
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jan; 112(1):146-9. PubMed ID: 18937970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does size matter? Tumor size and morphology as predictors of nodal status and recurrence in endometrial cancer.
Shah C; Johnson EB; Everett E; Tamimi H; Greer B; Swisher E; Goff B
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):564-70. PubMed ID: 16246402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymph node metastasis in endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus with occult cervical involvement.
Boren T; Lea J; Kehoe S; Miller DS; Richardson D
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 22713294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of adjuvant chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy in high-risk early stage endometrial carcinoma.
Jutzi L; Hoskins P; Lim P; Aquino-Parsons C; Tinker A; Kwon JS
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Dec; 131(3):581-5. PubMed ID: 24055614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The risk of lymph node metastasis based on myometrial invasion and tumor grade in endometrioid uterine cancers: a multicenter, retrospective Korean study.
Lee KB; Ki KD; Lee JM; Lee JK; Kim JW; Cho CH; Kim SM; Park SY; Jeong DH; Kim KT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2882-7. PubMed ID: 19484311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lower uterine segment involvement as a predictor for lymph node spread in endometrial carcinoma.
Madom LM; Brown AK; Lui F; Moore RG; Granai CO; Disilvestro PA
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 17629550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation.
Jolly S; Vargas CE; Kumar T; Weiner SA; Brabbins DS; Chen PY; Floyd W; Martinez AA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 16545441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer.
Cragun JM; Havrilesky LJ; Calingaert B; Synan I; Secord AA; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL; Berchuck A
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jun; 23(16):3668-75. PubMed ID: 15738538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of FIGO Stage IIIc endometrial cancer patients.
McMeekin DS; Lashbrook D; Gold M; Johnson G; Walker JL; Mannel R
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 11330962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prognostic significance of age in surgically staged patients with Type II endometrial carcinoma.
Vance S; Yechieli R; Cogan C; Hanna R; Munkarah A; Elshaikh MA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jul; 126(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 22507535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
