These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24183842)

  • 1. Evidence-based approach to harmonised reference intervals.
    Koerbin G; Sikaris KA; Jones GR; Ryan J; Reed M; Tate J;
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():99-107. PubMed ID: 24183842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The theory of reference values: an unfinished symphony.
    Siest G; Henny J; Gräsbeck R; Wilding P; Petitclerc C; Queraltó JM; Hyltoft Petersen P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Jan; 51(1):47-64. PubMed ID: 23183761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Canadian laboratory initiative on pediatric reference intervals: A CALIPER white paper.
    Adeli K; Higgins V; Trajcevski K; White-Al Habeeb N
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 2017 Sep; 54(6):358-413. PubMed ID: 29017389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validating common reference intervals in routine laboratories.
    Jones GR
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():119-21. PubMed ID: 24144864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Determining and verifying reference intervals in clinical laboratories].
    Henny J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2011; 69(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21464019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Updated reference intervals for clinical chemical components].
    Urdal P; Bolann B; Marstein S; Rustad P; Steensland H; Asberg A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Jun; 124(11):1515-7. PubMed ID: 15195155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical performance, reference values and decision limits. A need to differentiate between reference intervals and decision limits and to define analytical quality specifications.
    Petersen PH; Jensen EA; Brandslund I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 50(5):819-31. PubMed ID: 22628319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference interval studies: what is the maximum number of samples recommended?
    Hawkins RC; Badrick T
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 51(11):2161-5. PubMed ID: 23798619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The determination and interpretation of reference intervals for multichannel serum chemistry tests.
    Mold JW; Aspy CB; Blick KE; Lawler FH
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Mar; 46(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 9519021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should we maintain the 95 percent reference intervals in the era of wellness testing? A concept paper.
    Jørgensen LG; Brandslund I; Hyltoft Petersen P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 15327009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytical quality specifications for common reference intervals.
    Ricós C; Doménech MV; Perich C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):858-62. PubMed ID: 15327023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance criteria of the post-analytical phase.
    Sikaris K
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):949-58. PubMed ID: 25894643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ASVCP reference interval guidelines: determination of de novo reference intervals in veterinary species and other related topics.
    Friedrichs KR; Harr KE; Freeman KP; Szladovits B; Walton RM; Barnhart KF; Blanco-Chavez J;
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Dec; 41(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 23240820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new approach for the determination of reference intervals from hospital-based data.
    Concordet D; Geffré A; Braun JP; Trumel C
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jul; 405(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 19351531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
    Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Promoting clinical and laboratory interaction by harmonization.
    Plebani M; Panteghini M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():15-21. PubMed ID: 24120352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of biological and analytical variations on the appropriate use of "reference intervals" in clinical chemistry. Proposal of a scheme for longitudinal assessment of laboratory values.
    Costongs GM; Janson PC; Brombacher PJ
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1984 Sep; 22(9):613-21. PubMed ID: 6491624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical considerations for harmonization of the global multicenter study on reference values.
    Ichihara K
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():108-18. PubMed ID: 24518360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opinion Paper: Deriving Harmonised Reference Intervals - Global Activities.
    Tate JR; Koerbin G; Adeli K
    EJIFCC; 2016 Feb; 27(1):48-65. PubMed ID: 27683506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.