199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24183918)
1. Comparison of automated chemiluminescence immunoassays with capture enzyme immunoassays for the detection of measles and mumps IgM antibodies in serum.
Haywood B; Patel M; Hurday S; Copping R; Webster D; Irish D; Haque T
J Virol Methods; 2014 Feb; 196():15-7. PubMed ID: 24183918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two chemiluminescent immunoassays in the detection of measles IgM antibodies.
Gómez-Camarasa C; Lara-Oya A; Cobo F; Sampedro-Martínez A; Rodríguez-Granger J; Gutierrez-Fernández J; Navarro-Marí JM
J Virol Methods; 2016 Nov; 237():38-39. PubMed ID: 27575683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of chemiluminescent immunoassay and ELISA for measles IgG and IgM.
de Ory F; Minguito T; Balfagón P; Sanz JC
APMIS; 2015 Aug; 123(8):648-51. PubMed ID: 26140432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of a new chemiluminiscent assay and an ELISA for the detection of IgM against measles.
Sampedro A; Rodríguez-Granger J; Gómez C; Lara A; Gutierrez J; Otero A
J Clin Lab Anal; 2013 Nov; 27(6):477-80. PubMed ID: 24218130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of fully automated assays for the detection of Rubella IgM and IgG antibodies by the Elecsys(®) immunoassay system.
van Helden J; Grangeot-Keros L; Vauloup-Fellous C; Vleminckx R; Masset F; Revello MG
J Virol Methods; 2014 Apr; 199():108-15. PubMed ID: 24487099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a chemiluminescence immunoassay and an enzyme immunoassay for detection of IgM antibodies against measles, mumps, rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), and human herpes virus (HHV) -1 and -2 infections.
Steve RJ; Mammen S; Selvaraj K; Yadav B; Abraham AM
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2022; 40(3):354-358. PubMed ID: 35725528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella antibodies among healthcare workers in Japan.
Hatakeyama S; Moriya K; Itoyama S; Nukui Y; Uchida M; Shintani Y; Morisawa Y; Kimura S
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 25(7):591-4. PubMed ID: 15301032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of tests for detection of parvovirus B19 IgG and IgM.
de Ory F; Minguito T; Echevarría JE; Del Mar Mosquera M; Fuertes A
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 23763266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the sensitivity of laboratory diagnostic methods from a well-characterized outbreak of mumps in New York city in 2009.
Rota JS; Rosen JB; Doll MK; McNall RJ; McGrew M; Williams N; Lopareva EN; Barskey AE; Punsalang A; Rota PA; Oleszko WR; Hickman CJ; Zimmerman CM; Bellini WJ
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 23324519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Diasorin Liaison® XL Zika Capture IgM CMIA for Zika virus serological testing.
Sloan A; Safronetz D; Makowski K; Barairo N; Ranadheera C; Dimitrova K; Holloway K; Mendoza E; Wood H; Drebot M; Gretchen A; Kadkhoda K
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Apr; 90(4):264-266. PubMed ID: 29310948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of nonspecific reactivity in indirect and reverse immunoassays for measles and mumps immunoglobulin M antibodies.
Tuokko H
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):972-6. PubMed ID: 6392329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High level expression of recombinant mumps nucleoprotein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its evaluation in mumps IgM serology.
Samuel D; Sasnauskas K; Jin L; Beard S; Zvirbliene A; Gedvilaite A; Cohen B
J Med Virol; 2002 Jan; 66(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 11748668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of neutralization test for laboratory diagnosis of suspected mumps.
Vaidya SR; Hamde VS; Kumbhar NS; Walimbe AM
Microbiol Immunol; 2018 Apr; 62(4):243-247. PubMed ID: 29363797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Eight Commercial Assays for the Detection of Measles Virus-Specific IgM Antibodies.
Hiebert J; Zubach V; Charlton CL; Fenton J; Tipples GA; Fonseca K; Severini A
J Clin Microbiol; 2021 May; 59(6):. PubMed ID: 33731415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of measles, mumps, and rubella antibodies in saliva using antibody capture radioimmunoassay.
Perry KR; Brown DW; Parry JV; Panday S; Pipkin C; Richards A
J Med Virol; 1993 Jul; 40(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 8355022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of IgM antibodies specific for measles virus by capture and indirect enzyme immunoassays.
Arista S; Ferraro D; Cascio A; Vizzi E; di Stefano R
Res Virol; 1995; 146(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 7481095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two automated immunoassays for the determination of Puumalavirus IgM and IgG.
Muyldermans A; Lagrou K; Patteet S; Van Esbroeck M; Van Ranst M; Saegeman V
J Clin Virol; 2014 Jun; 60(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 24713176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of indirect immunoglobulin M (IgM) serology tests and IgM capture assays for laboratory diagnosis of measles.
Ratnam S; Tipples G; Head C; Fauvel M; Fearon M; Ward BJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 38(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 10618071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Bio-Rad BioPlex Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella-Zoster Virus IgG multiplex bead immunoassay.
Binnicker MJ; Jespersen DJ; Rollins LO
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):1524-6. PubMed ID: 21795463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a commercial assay for the detection of mumps specific IgM antibodies in oral fluid and serum specimens.
Warrener L; Samuel D
J Clin Virol; 2006 Feb; 35(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 16318926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
