These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24184652)

  • 21. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative ileus following anterior, posterior, and circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Fineberg SJ; Nandyala SV; Kurd MF; Marquez-Lara A; Noureldin M; Sankaranarayanan S; Patel AA; Oglesby M; Singh K
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1680-5. PubMed ID: 24184650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
    Goz V; Weinreb JH; Schwab F; Lafage V; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2019-27. PubMed ID: 24333459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients.
    Christensen FB; Hansen ES; Eiskjaer SP; Høy K; Helmig P; Neumann P; Niedermann B; Bünger CE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Dec; 27(23):2674-83. PubMed ID: 12461393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preliminary results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment for the treatment of sagittal malalignment.
    Hosseini P; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Bagheri R; Vargas E; Tran S; Akbarnia BA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E6. PubMed ID: 29191100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. PLF+PS or ALIF+PS: which has a lower operative nonunion rate? Analysis of a cohort of 2,061 patients from a National Spine Registry.
    Norheim EP; Royse KE; Brara HS; Moller DJ; Suen PW; Rahman SU; Harris JE; Guppy KH
    Spine J; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1118-1125. PubMed ID: 33640585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of posterolateral fusion with and without additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Ha KY; Na KH; Shin JH; Kim KW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18525481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Primary anterior lumbar interbody fusion, with and without posterior instrumentation: a 1,377-patient cohort from a multicenter spine registry.
    Laiwalla AN; Chang RN; Harary M; Salek SA; Richards HG; Brara HS; Hirt D; Harris JE; Terterov S; Tabaraee E; Rahman SU
    Spine J; 2024 Mar; 24(3):496-505. PubMed ID: 37875244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Thirty day postoperative outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Abt NB; De la Garza-Ramos R; Olorundare IO; McCutcheon BA; Bydon A; Fogelson J; Nassr A; Bydon M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Apr; 143():126-31. PubMed ID: 26937864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: interbody techniques for lumbar fusion.
    Mummaneni PV; Dhall SS; Eck JC; Groff MW; Ghogawala Z; Watters WC; Dailey AT; Resnick DK; Choudhri TF; Sharan A; Wang JC; Kaiser MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24980588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is the current insurance structure leading to seasonality in demand for spinal surgery? A quarterly, yearly, and insurance based analysis.
    Wahood W; Alexander AY; Alvi MA; Goyal A; Habermann EB; Bydon M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 201():106429. PubMed ID: 33360953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fusion techniques for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review.
    Wang SJ; Han YC; Liu XM; Ma B; Zhao WD; Wu DS; Tan J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jun; 134(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 24715157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level with Degenerative Spinal Disease.
    Lee N; Kim KN; Yi S; Ha Y; Shin DA; Yoon DH; Kim KS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():216-226. PubMed ID: 28189865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trends analysis of rhBMP utilization in single-level posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) in the United States.
    Lao L; Cohen JR; Lord EL; Buser Z; Wang JC
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Mar; 25(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 26003814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Ekman P; Möller H; Tullberg T; Neumann P; Hedlund R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(20):2178-83. PubMed ID: 17873808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [ALIF and PLIF interposition in low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis L5/S1 : Longterm-Comparison of interbody fusion techniques (ALIF - PLIF)].
    Fleege C; Arabmotlagh M; Rother W; Rauschmann M; Rickert M
    Orthopade; 2016 Sep; 45(9):760-9. PubMed ID: 27565160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database does not accurately reflect surgical indications for fusion.
    Gologorsky Y; Knightly JJ; Chi JH; Groff MW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):984-93. PubMed ID: 25325170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Lumbar fusion-Indications and techniques].
    Schnake KJ; Rappert D; Storzer B; Schreyer S; Hilber F; Mehren C
    Orthopade; 2019 Jan; 48(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 30552449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes.
    Müslüman AM; Yılmaz A; Cansever T; Cavuşoğlu H; Colak I; Genç HA; Aydın Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Apr; 14(4):488-96. PubMed ID: 21314280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of instrumented posterolateral fusion versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients with L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis and foraminal stenosis.
    Shim JH; Kim WS; Kim JH; Kim DH; Hwang JH; Park CK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Sep; 15(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 21599444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.