These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24184788)

  • 1. Short- and long-term electrical performance of the 5086MRI pacing lead.
    Rickard J; Taborsky M; Bello D; Johnson WB; Ramza B; Chang Y; Wilkoff BL
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 24184788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical routine implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker system designed for safe use with MRI: a single center, retrospective study on lead performance of Medtronic lead 5086MRI in comparison to Medtronic leads 4592-53 and 4092-58.
    Wollmann CG; Thudt K; Vock P; Globits S; Mayr H
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2011 Dec; 22(4):233-6, 239-42. PubMed ID: 22127540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safe performance of magnetic resonance of the heart in patients with magnetic resonance conditional pacemaker systems: the safety issue of the ESTIMATE study.
    Wollmann CG; Thudt K; Kaiser B; Salomonowitz E; Mayr H; Globits S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 May; 16(1):30. PubMed ID: 24886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI scanning in patients with new and existing CapSureFix Novus 5076 pacemaker leads: randomized trial results.
    Shenthar J; Milasinovic G; Al Fagih A; Götte M; Engel G; Wolff S; Tse HF; Herr J; Carrithers J; Cerkvenik J; Nähle CP
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Apr; 12(4):759-65. PubMed ID: 25556038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicenter study of the safety and effects of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary sinus left ventricular pacing leads.
    Sheldon SH; Bunch TJ; Cogert GA; Acker NG; Dalzell CM; Higgins JV; Espinosa RE; Asirvatham SJ; Cha YM; Felmlee JP; Watson RE; Anderson JL; Brooks MH; Osborn JS; Friedman PA
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Feb; 12(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 25433144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 12-year experience of bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial pacing leads in children.
    Tomaske M; Gerritse B; Kretzers L; Pretre R; Dodge-Khatami A; Rahn M; Bauersfeld U
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 May; 85(5):1704-11. PubMed ID: 18442570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased perforation risk with an MRI-conditional pacing lead: a single-center study.
    Acha MR; Keaney JJ; Lubitz SA; Milan DJ; Mansour M; Heist KE; Ptaszek LM; Singh JP; Blendea D; Mela T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 38(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25469809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Abandoned Leads.
    Schaller RD; Brunker T; Riley MP; Marchlinski FE; Nazarian S; Litt H
    JAMA Cardiol; 2021 May; 6(5):549-556. PubMed ID: 33595595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac perforation and lead dislodgement after implantation of a MR-conditional pacing lead: a single-center experience.
    Elmouchi DA; Rosema S; Vanoosterhout SM; Khan M; Davis AT; Gauri AJ; Finta B; Woelfel AK; Chalfoun NT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 24215291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and effectiveness of a 6-French MRI conditional pacemaker lead: The INGEVITY
    Nielsen JC; Giudici M; Tolasana Viu JM; Chew E; Sommerijns E; Wold N; Evert L; Love CJ; Stein K; Olaf H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 40(10):1121-1128. PubMed ID: 28727156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla.
    Gimbel JR; Bello D; Schmitt M; Merkely B; Schwitter J; Hayes DL; Sommer T; Schloss EJ; Chang Y; Willey S; Kanal E;
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 May; 10(5):685-91. PubMed ID: 23333721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-center clinical experience with a lumenless, catheter-delivered, bipolar, permanent pacemaker lead: implant safety and electrical performance.
    Gammage MD; Lieberman RA; Yee R; Manolis AS; Compton SJ; Khazen C; Schaaf K; Oleson KA; Crossley GH;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Aug; 29(8):858-65. PubMed ID: 16923002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-World Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Conditional Pacemaker System: Results of 4-Year Prospective Follow-Up in 2,629 Patients.
    Williamson BD; Gohn DC; Ramza BM; Singh B; Zhong Y; Li S; Shanahan L;
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Nov; 3(11):1231-1239. PubMed ID: 29759618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Atrial pacing and sensing characteristics in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Schuchert A; Aydin MA; Israel C; Gaby G; Paul V
    Europace; 2005 Mar; 7(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 15763532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of prophylactic epicardial pacing leads in children and young adults.
    Cohen MI; Rhodes LA; Spray TL; Gaynor JW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jul; 78(1):197-202; discussion 202-3. PubMed ID: 15223427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system: clinical study design.
    Sutton R; Kanal E; Wilkoff BL; Bello D; Luechinger R; Jenniskens I; Hull M; Sommer T
    Trials; 2008 Dec; 9():68. PubMed ID: 19055703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence to support magnetic resonance conditional labelling of all pacemaker and defibrillator leads in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
    Bhuva AN; Moralee R; Brunker T; Lascelles K; Cash L; Patel KP; Lowe M; Sekhri N; Alpendurada F; Pennell DJ; Schilling R; Lambiase PD; Chow A; Moon JC; Litt H; Baksi AJ; Manisty CH
    Eur Heart J; 2022 Jul; 43(26):2469-2478. PubMed ID: 34435642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices.
    Nazarian S; Hansford R; Roguin A; Goldsher D; Zviman MM; Lardo AC; Caffo BS; Frick KD; Kraut MA; Kamel IR; Calkins H; Berger RD; Bluemke DA; Halperin HR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(7):415-24. PubMed ID: 21969340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications of permanent cardiac pacing in patients with persistent left superior vena cava.
    Polewczyk A; Kutarski A; Czekajska-Chehab E; Adamczyk P; Boczar K; Polewczyk M; Janion M
    Cardiol J; 2014; 21(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 24526508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Safety of Cardiac and Thoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.
    Dandamudi S; Collins JD; Carr JC; Mongkolwat P; Rahsepar AA; Tomson TT; Verma N; Arora R; Chicos AB; Kim SS; Lin AC; Passman RS; Knight BP
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1498-1505. PubMed ID: 27717762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.