These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right. Scharine AA; McBeath MK Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 12452271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Why do children make mirror errors in reading? Neural correlates of mirror invariance in the visual word form area. Dehaene S; Nakamura K; Jobert A; Kuroki C; Ogawa S; Cohen L Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1837-48. PubMed ID: 19770045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. English and Hebrew letter report by English- and Hebrew-reading subjects: evidence for stimulus control, not hemispheric asymmetry. Lubow RE; Tsal Y; Mirkin A; Mazliah G Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 8043265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Sources of Directional Spatial Biases in Hemi-Image Drawing. Garcia O; Faghihi N; Vaid J Perception; 2020 Feb; 49(2):169-185. PubMed ID: 31830429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Differential recognition of tachistoscopically presented English and Hebrew words in right and left visual fields. Barton MI; Goodglass H; Shai A Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Oct; 21(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 5848913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Hemisphere lateralization is influenced by bilingual status and composition of words. Peng G; Wang WS Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1981-6. PubMed ID: 21439988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Left face matching bias: right hemisphere dominance or scanning habits? Megreya AM; Havard C Laterality; 2011 Jan; 16(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 21204307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Leftward lighting in advertisements increases advertisement ratings and purchase intention. Hutchison J; Thomas NA; Elias L Laterality; 2011 Jul; 16(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 21038169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reading space into numbers: a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Shaki S; Fischer MH Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):590-9. PubMed ID: 18514179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: instructional and cultural dependencies. Shaki S; Petrusic WM; Leth-Steensen C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):515-30. PubMed ID: 22288694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials. Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The relationship between sign production and sign comprehension: What handedness reveals. Watkins F; Thompson RL Cognition; 2017 Jul; 164():144-149. PubMed ID: 28427030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Left-handers' struggle in a rightward wor(l)d: The relation between horizontal spatial bias and effort in directed movements. Suitner C; Maass A; Bettinsoli ML; Carraro L; Kumar S Laterality; 2017 Jan; 22(1):60-89. PubMed ID: 26720399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Stable individual differences predict eye movements to the left, but not handedness or line bisection. Foulsham T; Frost E; Sage L Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():38-46. PubMed ID: 29499212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Handedness and hemispheric differences for feature perturbations. Polich J; Morgan CD Brain Cogn; 1994 Jul; 25(2):220-34. PubMed ID: 7917243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]