These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24187308)

  • 1. Dynamic arm supports: overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function.
    van der Heide LA; Gelderblom GJ; de Witte LP
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650491. PubMed ID: 24187308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function.
    Van der Heide LA; van Ninhuijs B; Bergsma A; Gelderblom GJ; van der Pijl DJ; de Witte LP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Aug; 38(4):287-302. PubMed ID: 23950551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the usability of an actively actuated arm support.
    Lebrasseur A; Lettre J; Routhier F; Bouffard J; Archambault PS; Campeau-Lecours A
    Assist Technol; 2021 Sep; 33(5):271-277. PubMed ID: 31207199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The perceived functional benefit of dynamic arm supports in daily life.
    van der Heide L; de Witte L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):1139-1150. PubMed ID: 28355038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the JACO robotic arm: clinico-economic study for powered wheelchair users with upper-extremity disabilities.
    Maheu V; Frappier J; Archambault PS; Routhier F
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975397. PubMed ID: 22275600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Daily activity patterns of people provided with a dynamic arm support.
    van der Heide LA; de Witte LP
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 217():819-24. PubMed ID: 26294569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotics, assistive technology, and occupational therapy management to improve upper limb function in pediatric neuromuscular diseases.
    Rahman T; Basante J; Alexander M
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2012 Aug; 23(3):701-17. PubMed ID: 22938883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects and effectiveness of dynamic arm supports: a technical review.
    van der Heide LA; Gelderblom GJ; de Witte LP
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 94(1):44-62. PubMed ID: 24901759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coordinated control of assistive robotic devices for activities of daily living tasks.
    Erol D; Sarkar N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2008 Jun; 16(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 18586607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a one-handed nail clipper for stroke survivors.
    Carhart C; Ciechowski R; Groat D; Stevans A
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2008; 15(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 18430684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User-centred assistive SystEm for arm Functions in neUromuscuLar subjects (USEFUL): a randomized controlled study.
    Longatelli V; Antonietti A; Biffi E; Diella E; D'Angelo MG; Rossini M; Molteni F; Bocciolone M; Pedrocchi A; Gandolla M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 33407580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Dynamic Arm Supports in Real Life Environments.
    van der Heide LA; Roentgen U; de Witte L
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():517-522. PubMed ID: 28873847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for studies on dynamic arm support devices in people with neuromuscular disorders: a scoping review with expert-based discussion.
    Essers JMN; Murgia A; Peters AA; Janssen MMHP; Meijer K
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Jul; 17(5):487-500. PubMed ID: 32981390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection criteria for static and dynamic mouthsticks.
    Ruff JC
    Gen Dent; 1990; 38(6):414-6. PubMed ID: 2151445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Engaging rehabilitation technologies: making things happen.
    McPherson KM; Kayes NM; Hale LA
    Disabil Rehabil; 2012; 34(22):1853-4. PubMed ID: 22494397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ability and perceived difficulty in daily activities in people with poliomyelitis sequelae.
    Thorén-Jönsson AL; Grimby G
    J Rehabil Med; 2001 Jan; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11480469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MANUS--a wheelchair-mounted rehabilitation robot.
    Driessen BJ; Evers HG; van Woerden JA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 11436271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of assistive devices in daily activities among 85-year-olds living at home focusing especially on the visually impaired.
    Dahlin-Ivanoff S; Sonn U
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 26(24):1423-30. PubMed ID: 15764362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assistive devices and home modifications in geriatric rehabilitation.
    Axtell LA; Yasuda YL
    Clin Geriatr Med; 1993 Nov; 9(4):803-21. PubMed ID: 8281506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in ability, perceived difficulty and use of assistive devices in everyday life: a 4-year follow-up study in people with late effects of polio.
    Thorén-Jönsson AL; Willén C; Sunnerhagen KS
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2009 Nov; 120(5):324-30. PubMed ID: 19519806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.