These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24187373)
61. [Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty:a narrative review]. Umiti T; Liu AF; Ji NN; Cao DD; Zhang Y Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 60(3):268-272. PubMed ID: 35078302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Dynamic in-vivo tibio-femoral and bearing motions in mobile bearing knee arthroplasty. Fantozzi S; Leardini A; Banks SA; Marcacci M; Giannini S; Catani F Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2004 Mar; 12(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 15024562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: do the polyethylene bearings rotate? Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR; Outten JT; Sharma A Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Nov; 440():88-95. PubMed ID: 16239789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Fehring TK Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Nov; (380):72-9. PubMed ID: 11064975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Single flexion-axis selection influences femoral component alignment and kinematics during knee simulation. DesJardins JD; Rusly RJ Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Aug; 225(8):762-8. PubMed ID: 21922953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Knee Arthroplasty Component Malrotation Does Not Affect Function or Quality of Life in the Short to Medium Term. Babazadeh S; Dowsey MM; Vasimalla MG; Stoney JD; Choong PFM J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1382-1386. PubMed ID: 30905638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. The effect of tibial polyethylene insert design on range of motion: evaluation of in vivo knee kinematics by a computerized navigation system during total knee arthroplasty. Klein GR; Parvizi J; Rapuri VR; Austin MS; Hozack WJ J Arthroplasty; 2004 Dec; 19(8):986-91. PubMed ID: 15586334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Fixed versus mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: a review of kinematics and results. Apostolopoulos AP; Michos IV; Mavrogenis AF; Chronopoulos E; Papachristou G; Lallos SN; Efstathopoulos NE J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2011; 21(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 22150352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Posterior stability in fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a radiological comparison of two implants. Siebold R; Louisia S; Canty J; Bartlett RJ Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Feb; 127(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 17021758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Circle-based model to estimate error in using the lowest points to indicate locations of contact developed by the femoral condyles on the tibial insert in total knee arthroplasty. Simileysky A; Ridenour D; Hull ML J Biomech; 2021 May; 120():110365. PubMed ID: 33812082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. A novel technique using sensor-based technology to evaluate tibial tray rotation. Roche MW; Elson LC; Anderson CR Orthopedics; 2015 Mar; 38(3):e217-22. PubMed ID: 25760510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Soft-tissue and alignment correction: the use of smart trials in total knee replacement. Gustke KA Bone Joint J; 2014 Nov; 96-B(11 Supple A):78-83. PubMed ID: 25381414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Computational wear of knee implant polyethylene insert surface under continuous dynamic loading and posterior tibial slope variation based on cadaver experiments with comparative verification. Ozer A BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Sep; 23(1):871. PubMed ID: 36123647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Sagittal curvature of total knee replacements predicts in vivo kinematics. Kessler O; Dürselen L; Banks S; Mannel H; Marin F Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 17029673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Detecting condylar contact loss using single-plane fluoroscopy: a comparison with in vivo force data and in vitro bi-plane data. Prins AH; Kaptein BL; Banks SA; Stoel BC; Nelissen RG; Valstar ER J Biomech; 2014 May; 47(7):1682-8. PubMed ID: 24636719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3. Mell SP; Wimmer MA; Lundberg HJ J Biomech; 2019 May; 88():104-112. PubMed ID: 30940359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. [Soft tissue balancing in total condylar knee arthroplasty]. Trepte CT; Pfanzelt K Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Jan; 128(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 12594617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Effect of posterior cut angle on tibial component loading. Bai B; Baez J; Testa N; Kummer FJ J Arthroplasty; 2000 Oct; 15(7):916-20. PubMed ID: 11061453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Comparison of micromotion in mobile bearing and posterior stabilized total knee prostheses: a randomized RSA study of 40 knees followed for 2 years. Garling EH; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16156463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]