187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24188578)
1. Pilot-scale investigation of drinking water ultrafiltration membrane fouling rates using advanced data analysis techniques.
Chen F; Peldszus S; Peiris RH; Ruhl AS; Mehrez R; Jekel M; Legge RL; Huck PM
Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():508-18. PubMed ID: 24188578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the role of feed water constituents in irreversible membrane fouling of pilot-scale ultrafiltration drinking water treatment systems.
Peiris RH; Jaklewicz M; Budman H; Legge RL; Moresoli C
Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3364-74. PubMed ID: 23615336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reversible and irreversible low-pressure membrane foulants in drinking water treatment: Identification by principal component analysis of fluorescence EEM and mitigation by biofiltration pretreatment.
Peldszus S; Hallé C; Peiris RH; Hamouda M; Jin X; Legge RL; Budman H; Moresoli C; Huck PM
Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(16):5161-70. PubMed ID: 21835423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydrophilic fraction of natural organic matter causing irreversible fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes.
Yamamura H; Okimoto K; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2014 May; 54():123-36. PubMed ID: 24565803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kinetics of natural organic matter (NOM) removal during drinking water biofiltration using different NOM characterization approaches.
Chen F; Peldszus S; Elhadidy AM; Legge RL; Van Dyke MI; Huck PM
Water Res; 2016 Nov; 104():361-370. PubMed ID: 27572138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluorescence analysis of NOM degradation by photocatalytic oxidation and its potential to mitigate membrane fouling in drinking water treatment.
Nerger BA; Peiris RH; Moresoli C
Chemosphere; 2015 Oct; 136():140-4. PubMed ID: 25981799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microfiltration of different surface waters with/without coagulation: clear correlations between membrane fouling and hydrophilic biopolymers.
Kimura K; Tanaka K; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():434-43. PubMed ID: 24210507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of effluent organic matter on low-pressure membrane fouling in tertiary treatment.
Ayache C; Pidou M; Croué JP; Labanowski J; Poussade Y; Tazi-Pain A; Keller J; Gernjak W
Water Res; 2013 May; 47(8):2633-42. PubMed ID: 23541121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding the fouling of UF/MF hollow fibres of biologically treated wastewaters using advanced EfOM characterization and statistical tools.
Filloux E; Labanowski J; Croue JP
Bioresour Technol; 2012 Aug; 118():460-8. PubMed ID: 22717564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions.
Huang H; Lee N; Young T; Gary A; Lozier JC; Jacangelo JG
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3823-32. PubMed ID: 17644151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of hydraulically reversible and hydraulically irreversible fouling on the removal of MS2 and φX174 bacteriophage by an ultrafiltration membrane.
ElHadidy AM; Peldszus S; Van Dyke MI
Water Res; 2014 Sep; 61():297-307. PubMed ID: 24967952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water.
Kimura K; Hane Y; Watanabe Y; Amy G; Ohkuma N
Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3431-41. PubMed ID: 15276760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying fouling events in a membrane-based drinking water treatment process using principal component analysis of fluorescence excitation-emission matrices.
Peiris RH; Hallé C; Budman H; Moresoli C; Peldszus S; Huck PM; Legge RL
Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 19818986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving ultrafiltration membrane performance with pre-deposited carbon nanotubes/nanofibers layers for drinking water treatment.
Cheng X; Zhou W; Li P; Ren Z; Wu D; Luo C; Tang X; Wang J; Liang H
Chemosphere; 2019 Nov; 234():545-557. PubMed ID: 31229716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing PAC contribution to the NOM fouling control in PAC/UF systems.
Campinas M; Rosa MJ
Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1636-44. PubMed ID: 19944444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the performance of biological filtration as pretreatment to low pressure membranes for drinking water.
Hallé C; Huck PM; Peldszus S; Haberkamp J; Jekel M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 May; 43(10):3878-84. PubMed ID: 19544902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlations of relevant membrane foulants with UF membrane fouling in different waters.
Tian JY; Ernst M; Cui F; Jekel M
Water Res; 2013 Mar; 47(3):1218-28. PubMed ID: 23245542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of hydrophobic/hydrophilic fractions of extracellular organic matters of Microcystis aeruginosa on ultrafiltration membrane fouling.
Zhou S; Shao Y; Gao N; Li L; Deng J; Tan C; Zhu M
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():201-7. PubMed ID: 24140690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of peroxymonosulfate oxidation activated by powdered activated carbon for mitigating ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by different natural organic matter fractions.
Cheng X; Li P; Zhou W; Wu D; Luo C; Liu W; Ren Z; Liang H
Chemosphere; 2019 Apr; 221():812-823. PubMed ID: 30684779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
