114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24188797)
1. Psychometric properties of the outcome questionnaire-45.2: the Norwegian version in an international context.
Amble I; Gude T; Stubdal S; Oktedalen T; Skjorten AM; Andersen BJ; Solbakken OA; Brorson HH; Arnevik E; Lambert MJ; Wampold BE
Psychother Res; 2014; 24(4):504-13. PubMed ID: 24188797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Portuguese version of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45): Normative data, reliability, and clinical significance cut-offs scores.
Machado PP; Fassnacht DB
Psychol Psychother; 2015 Dec; 88(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 25484181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 feedback system in Norway: A multisite randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting.
Amble I; Gude T; Stubdal S; Andersen BJ; Wampold BE
Psychother Res; 2015; 25(6):669-77. PubMed ID: 25101527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of the youth outcome questionnaire self-report.
Ridge NW; Warren JS; Burlingame GM; Wells MG; Tumblin KM
J Clin Psychol; 2009 Oct; 65(10):1115-26. PubMed ID: 19693961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Hebrew and Arabic Versions of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45).
Gross R; Glasser S; Elisha D; Tishby O; Madar Jacobson D; Levitan G; Lambert MJ; Ponizovsky AM
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2015; 52(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 25841108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The orthogonal-oblique bi-level model of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2): Polish adaptation based on factor analysis.
Simon W; Śliwka P; Sobański JA; Klasa K; Sala P; Żak W; Busath G; Lambert MJ
Psychiatr Pol; 2015; 49(5):1043-70. PubMed ID: 26688853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Swedish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM).
Elfström ML; Evans C; Lundgren J; Johansson B; Hakeberg M; Carlsson SG
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2013; 20(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 22438100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The outcome questionnaire 45.2. Italian validation of an instrument for the assessment of psychological treatments].
Chiappelli M; Lo Coco G; Gullo S; Bensi L; Prestano C
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2008; 17(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 18589632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the Responsiveness to Therapeutic Change with Routine Outcome Monitoring: A Comparison of the Symptom Questionnaire-48 (SQ-48) with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45).
Carlier IV; Kovács V; van Noorden MS; van der Feltz-Cornelis C; Mooij N; Schulte-van Maaren YW; van Hemert AM; Zitman FG; Giltay EJ
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2017 Jan; 24(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 26450457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The factorial structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45: a study with an Italian sample.
Lo Coco G; Chiappelli M; Bensi L; Gullo S; Prestano C; Lambert MJ
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2008; 15(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 19115460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical psychological diagnostic system (KPD-38): sensitivity to change and validity of a self-report instrument for outcome monitoring and quality assurance.
Moessner M; Gallas C; Haug S; Kordy H
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2011; 18(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 20812367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translation of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ) into Japanese: A cultural adaptation.
Takara R; Beecher ME; Okiishi JC; Shimokawa K; Lambert MJ; Griner D
Psychother Res; 2017 Mar; 27(2):154-166. PubMed ID: 26360667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.
Huxley P; Evans S; Madge S; Webber M; Burchardt T; McDaid D; Knapp M
Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. PubMed ID: 22260923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006).
Deilkås ET; Hofoss D
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Sep; 8():191. PubMed ID: 18808693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity to change of youth treatment outcome measures: a comparison of the CBCL, BASC-2, and Y-OQ.
McClendon DT; Warren JS; Green KM; Burlingame GM; Eggett DL; McClendon RJ
J Clin Psychol; 2011 Jan; 67(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 21046644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2.
Boswell DL; White JK; Sims WD; Harrist RS; Romans JS
Psychol Rep; 2013 Jun; 112(3):689-93. PubMed ID: 24245064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Norwegian EUROPEP questionnaire for patient evaluation of general practice: data quality, reliability and construct validity.
Bjertnaes OA; Lyngstad I; Malterud K; Garratt A
Fam Pract; 2011 Jun; 28(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 21078822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How and when feedback works in psychotherapy: Is it the signal?
Amble I; Gude T; Ulvenes P; Stubdal S; Wampold BE
Psychother Res; 2016 Sep; 26(5):545-55. PubMed ID: 26169948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Swedish version of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45): reliability and factor structure in a substance abuse sample.
Wennberg P; Philips B; de Jong K
Psychol Psychother; 2010 Sep; 83(Pt 3):325-9. PubMed ID: 20021732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing health-related quality of life in adolescents: some psychometric properties of the first Norwegian version of KINDL.
Helseth S; Lund T
Scand J Caring Sci; 2005 Jun; 19(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 15877635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
