These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24189324)

  • 1. Evaluation of the interfacial work of fracture of glass-ionomer cements bonded to dentin.
    Cheetham JJ; Palamara JE; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jan; 29():427-37. PubMed ID: 24189324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer cements to artificially created carious dentin.
    Choi K; Oshida Y; Platt JA; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Yi K
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 17024948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture toughness ov conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer/dentin interfaces.
    Tam LE; Dev S; Pilliar RM
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):144-50. PubMed ID: 8700782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to caries-affected primary tooth dentin.
    Alves FB; Hesse D; Lenzi TL; Guglielmi Cde A; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Carvalho TS; Raggio DP
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 23930629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Pereira PN; Yamada T; Tei R; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9545887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of smear layer deproteinization with HOCl solution on the dentin bonding of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Paing SY; Tichy A; Hosaka K; Nagano D; Nakajima M; Tagami J
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2020 Jun; 128(3):255-262. PubMed ID: 32311176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin.
    Yip HK; Tay FR; Ngo HC; Smales RJ; Pashley DH
    Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 11445213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of Class I cavity walls after thermocycling.
    Sampaio PC; de Almeida Júnior AA; Francisconi LF; Casas-Apayco LC; Pereira JC; Wang L; Atta MT
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 21913841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements.
    Pereira LC; Nunes MC; Dibb RG; Powers JM; Roulet JF; Navarro MF
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 12071632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adhesion of glass ionomer cements to primary dentin using a universal adhesive.
    Iranparvar P; Ghasemi A; Iranparvar P
    Dent Med Probl; 2024; 61(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 38426654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of antibacterial and adhesion properties of chitosan-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Ibrahim MA; Neo J; Esguerra RJ; Fawzy AS
    J Biomater Appl; 2015 Oct; 30(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 26079388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements.
    Xie D; Brantley WA; Culbertson BM; Wang G
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11203534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compound changes and tooth mineralization effects of glass ionomer cements containing bioactive glass (S53P4), an in vivo study.
    Yli-Urpo H; Närhi M; Närhi T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Oct; 26(30):5934-41. PubMed ID: 15958240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Wang L; Sakai VT; Kawai ES; Buzalaf MA; Atta MT
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16457670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.