160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24189328)
21. Predictors of Discharge Settings After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients.
Welsh RL; Wild DL; Karmarkar AM; Leland NE; Baillargeon JG; Ottenbacher KJ; Graham JE
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 101(9):1509-1514. PubMed ID: 32553900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A multicenter examination of the Center for Medicare Services eligibility criteria in total-joint arthroplasty.
Vincent KR; Vincent HK
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jul; 87(7):573-84. PubMed ID: 18574349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. How much is postacute care use affected by its availability?
Buntin MB; Garten AD; Paddock S; Saliba D; Totten M; Escarce JJ
Health Serv Res; 2005 Apr; 40(2):413-34. PubMed ID: 15762900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Commentary on the comparative effectiveness of alternative settings for joint replacement rehabilitation.
Stineman MG; Chan L
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 90(8):1257-9. PubMed ID: 19651259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patterns of rehabilitation utilization after hip fracture in acute hospitals and skilled nursing facilities.
Harada ND; Chun A; Chiu V; Pakalniskis A
Med Care; 2000 Nov; 38(11):1119-30. PubMed ID: 11078052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Self-Care and Mobility Following Postacute Rehabilitation for Older Adults With Hip Fracture: A Multilevel Analysis.
Cary MP; Pan W; Sloane R; Bettger JP; Hoenig H; Merwin EI; Anderson RA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 May; 97(5):760-71. PubMed ID: 26836951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcome after rehabilitation for total joint replacement at IRF and SNF: a case-controlled comparison.
Walsh MB; Herbold J
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 85(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16357542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does postacute care site matter? A longitudinal study assessing functional recovery after a stroke.
Deutsch A
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 94(4):630-2. PubMed ID: 23453907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spending On Care After Surgery Driven By Choice Of Care Settings Instead Of Intensity Of Services.
Chen LM; Norton EC; Banerjee M; Regenbogen SE; Cain-Nielsen AH; Birkmeyer JD
Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Jan; 36(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 28069850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characterizing rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
DeJong G; Hsieh CH; Gassaway J; Horn SD; Smout RJ; Putman K; James R; Brown M; Newman EM; Foley MP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 90(8):1269-83. PubMed ID: 19651261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Determination of Postacute Hospitalization Level of Care.
Mayer RS; Noles A; Vinh D
Med Clin North Am; 2020 Mar; 104(2):345-357. PubMed ID: 32035573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs for Medicare beneficiaries with hip fracture.
Deutsch A; Granger CV; Fiedler RC; DeJong G; Kane RL; Ottenbacher KJ; Heinemann AW; Naughton JP; Trevisan M
Med Care; 2005 Sep; 43(9):892-901. PubMed ID: 16116354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Postacute Care After Major Abdominal Surgery in Elderly Patients: Intersection of Age, Functional Status, and Postoperative Complications.
Balentine CJ; Naik AD; Berger DH; Chen H; Anaya DA; Kennedy GD
JAMA Surg; 2016 Aug; 151(8):759-66. PubMed ID: 27144881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Site-neutral payment for postacute care: framing the issue.
DeJong G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 95(6):1212-6. PubMed ID: 24607836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of institutional services and characteristics on use of postacute care settings.
Buczko W
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 2001; 24(1):103-32. PubMed ID: 12134560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke. A comparison of rehabilitation settings.
Kramer AM; Steiner JF; Schlenker RE; Eilertsen TB; Hrincevich CA; Tropea DA; Ahmad LA; Eckhoff DG
JAMA; 1997 Feb; 277(5):396-404. PubMed ID: 9010172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rehabilitation costs: implications for prospective payment.
Schlenker RE; Kramer AM; Hrincevich CA; Eilertsen TB
Health Serv Res; 1997 Dec; 32(5):651-68. PubMed ID: 9402906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bundled Payment Initiative for Hip Fracture Arthroplasty Patients: One Institution's Experience.
Lott A; Haglin JM; Belayneh R; Konda S; Egol KA
J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Mar; 33(3):e89-e92. PubMed ID: 30562253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Regulatory policies, the "75% rule," and post-acute care discharge setting.
Pezzin LE; Roberts BA; Miao H; Dillingham TR
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Nov; 90(11):954-8. PubMed ID: 21885948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Variation in Rehabilitation Treatment Patterns for Hip Fracture Treated With Arthroplasty.
Siebens HC; Sharkey P; Aronow HU; Deutscher D; Roberts P; Munin MC; Radnay CS; Horn SD
PM R; 2016 Mar; 8(3):191-207. PubMed ID: 26226210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
