BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24189549)

  • 21. Computational analysis of GAL pathway pinpoints mechanisms underlying natural variation.
    Hong J; Palme J; Hua B; Springer M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Sep; 17(9):e1008691. PubMed ID: 34570755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cellular plasticity enables adaptation to unforeseen cell-cycle rewiring challenges.
    Katzir Y; Stolovicki E; Stern S; Braun E
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45184. PubMed ID: 23028834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Lee TI; Rinaldi NJ; Robert F; Odom DT; Bar-Joseph Z; Gerber GK; Hannett NM; Harbison CT; Thompson CM; Simon I; Zeitlinger J; Jennings EG; Murray HL; Gordon DB; Ren B; Wyrick JJ; Tagne JB; Volkert TL; Fraenkel E; Gifford DK; Young RA
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5594):799-804. PubMed ID: 12399584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multistability, oscillations and bifurcations in feedback loops.
    Leite MC; Wang Y
    Math Biosci Eng; 2010 Jan; 7(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 20104950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Steady-state analysis of glucose repression reveals hierarchical expression of proteins under Mig1p control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Verma M; Bhat PJ; Venkatesh KV
    Biochem J; 2005 Jun; 388(Pt 3):843-9. PubMed ID: 15698380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Autoregulation of regulatory proteins is key for dynamic operation of GAL switch in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Ruhela A; Verma M; Edwards JS; Bhat PJ; Bhartiya S; Venkatesh KV
    FEBS Lett; 2004 Oct; 576(1-2):119-26. PubMed ID: 15474022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Network hubs buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Levy SF; Siegal ML
    PLoS Biol; 2008 Nov; 6(11):e264. PubMed ID: 18986213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The combination of positive and negative feedback loops confers exquisite flexibility to biochemical switches.
    Pfeuty B; Kaneko K
    Phys Biol; 2009 Nov; 6(4):046013. PubMed ID: 19910671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Self-Amplifying Pulsatile Protein Dynamics without Positive Feedback.
    Martinez-Corral R; Raimundez E; Lin Y; Elowitz MB; Garcia-Ojalvo J
    Cell Syst; 2018 Oct; 7(4):453-462.e1. PubMed ID: 30316816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. PKA and Sch9 control a molecular switch important for the proper adaptation to nutrient availability.
    Roosen J; Engelen K; Marchal K; Mathys J; Griffioen G; Cameroni E; Thevelein JM; De Virgilio C; De Moor B; Winderickx J
    Mol Microbiol; 2005 Feb; 55(3):862-80. PubMed ID: 15661010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Metabolic control of transcription: paradigms and lessons from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Campbell RN; Leverentz MK; Ryan LA; Reece RJ
    Biochem J; 2008 Sep; 414(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 18687061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modulation of dynamic modes by interplay between positive and negative feedback loops in gene regulatory networks.
    Wang LS; Li NX; Chen JJ; Zhang XP; Liu F; Wang W
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Apr; 97(4-1):042412. PubMed ID: 29758769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast.
    Gancedo JM
    FEMS Microbiol Rev; 2008 Jul; 32(4):673-704. PubMed ID: 18559076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Expression dynamics of a cellular metabolic network.
    Kharchenko P; Church GM; Vitkup D
    Mol Syst Biol; 2005; 1():2005.0016. PubMed ID: 16729051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A yeast catabolic enzyme controls transcriptional memory.
    Zacharioudakis I; Gligoris T; Tzamarias D
    Curr Biol; 2007 Dec; 17(23):2041-6. PubMed ID: 17997309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Coupling between feedback loops in autoregulatory networks affects bistability range, open-loop gain and switching times.
    Tiwari A; Igoshin OA
    Phys Biol; 2012 Oct; 9(5):055003. PubMed ID: 23011599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved galactose fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae through inverse metabolic engineering.
    Lee KS; Hong ME; Jung SC; Ha SJ; Yu BJ; Koo HM; Park SM; Seo JH; Kweon DH; Park JC; Jin YS
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Mar; 108(3):621-31. PubMed ID: 21246509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single cell resolution in regulation of gene expression.
    Bahcall OG
    Mol Syst Biol; 2005; 1():2005.0015. PubMed ID: 16729050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A general mechanism for network-dosage compensation in gene circuits.
    Acar M; Pando BF; Arnold FH; Elowitz MB; van Oudenaarden A
    Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1656-60. PubMed ID: 20929850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Synergistic dual positive feedback loops established by molecular sequestration generate robust bimodal response.
    Venturelli OS; El-Samad H; Murray RM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Nov; 109(48):E3324-33. PubMed ID: 23150580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.