192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24190034)
1. Correlations between F-18 FDG PET/CT and pathological findings in soft tissue lesions.
Nose H; Otsuka H; Otomi Y; Terazawa K; Takao S; Iwamoto S; Harada M
J Med Invest; 2013; 60(3-4):184-90. PubMed ID: 24190034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of soft-tissue lesions with (18)F-FDG PET/CT: initial results of a prospective trial.
Leal AL; Etchebehere M; Santos AO; Kalaf G; Pacheco EB; Amstalden EM; Etchebehere EC
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Mar; 35(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 24300379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical efficacy of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors.
Shin DS; Shon OJ; Han DS; Choi JH; Chun KA; Cho IH
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 22(7):603-9. PubMed ID: 18756363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of soft tissue and bone sarcomas from benign lesions utilizing
Chen B; Feng H; Xie J; Li C; Zhang Y; Wang S
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jul; 20(1):85. PubMed ID: 32711449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Texture analysis on (18)F-FDG PET/CT images to differentiate malignant and benign bone and soft-tissue lesions.
Xu R; Kido S; Suga K; Hirano Y; Tachibana R; Muramatsu K; Chagawa K; Tanaka S
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Nov; 28(9):926-35. PubMed ID: 25107363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PET evaluation of fatty tumors in the extremity: possibility of using the standardized uptake value (SUV) to differentiate benign tumors from liposarcoma.
Suzuki R; Watanabe H; Yanagawa T; Sato J; Shinozaki T; Suzuki H; Endo K; Takagishi K
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Dec; 19(8):661-70. PubMed ID: 16444991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation between malignant and benign pathologic fractures with F-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Shin DS; Shon OJ; Byun SJ; Choi JH; Chun KA; Cho IH
Skeletal Radiol; 2008 May; 37(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 18309481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with that of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T.
Magometschnigg HF; Baltzer PA; Fueger B; Helbich TH; Karanikas G; Dubsky P; Rudas M; Weber M; Pinker K
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1656-1665. PubMed ID: 26121928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of F-18 FDG PET and 201Tl scintigraphy for detection of primary malignant bone and soft-tissue tumors.
Yamamoto Y; Kawaguchi Y; Kawase Y; Maeda Y; Nishiyama Y
Clin Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 36(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 21368603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FDG-PET for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue masses.
Aoki J; Watanabe H; Shinozaki T; Takagishi K; Tokunaga M; Koyama Y; Sato N; Endo K
Skeletal Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 12605276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a diagnostic
Lim CH; Seok HY; Hyun SH; Moon SH; Cho YS; Lee KH; Kim BT; Choi JY
Clin Radiol; 2019 Mar; 74(3):207-215. PubMed ID: 30638733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of delayed 18F-FDG PET in differential diagnosis for malignant soft-tissue tumors.
Hamada K; Tomita Y; Ueda T; Enomoto K; Kakunaga S; Myoui A; Higuchi I; Yoshikawa H; Hatazawa J
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Dec; 20(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 17385305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the characterization of pancreatic masses: experience from tropics.
Santhosh S; Mittal BR; Bhasin D; Srinivasan R; Rana S; Das A; Nada R; Bhattacharya A; Gupta R; Kapoor R
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Feb; 28(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 23278193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of (18)F-FDG PET and MRI in differentiating benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.
Broski SM; Johnson GB; Howe BM; Nathan MA; Wenger DE; Spinner RJ; Amrami KK
Skeletal Radiol; 2016 Aug; 45(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 27115884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring bone and soft-tissue tumors after carbon-ion radiotherapy using ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography: a retrospective cohort study.
Yanagawa T; Saito K; Kiyohara H; Ohno T; Nakano T; Takagishi K
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Dec; 10():259. PubMed ID: 26691334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.
Cho WI; Chang UK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Feb; 14(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 21214309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity of FDG uptake is not everything: synchronous liposarcoma and fibrous dysplasia in the same patient on FDG PET-CT imaging.
Charest M; Singnurkar A; Hickeson M; Novales JA; Derbekyan V
Clin Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 33(7):455-8. PubMed ID: 18580228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of dual time point (18)F-FDG PET imaging for the differentiation between malignant and benign lesions.
Lan XL; Zhang YX; Wu ZJ; Jia Q; Wei H; Gao ZR
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):756-64. PubMed ID: 18555033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
