These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24190098)

  • 1. The integration of the risk management process with the lifecycle of medical device software.
    Pecoraro F; Luzi D
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 24190098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical device software: a new challenge.
    Luzi D; Pecoraro F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():885-90. PubMed ID: 22874320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Healthcare software assurance.
    Cooper JG; Pauley KA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():166-70. PubMed ID: 17238324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Harm related to medical device use - legal and organisational risks].
    Hölscher UM
    Gesundheitswesen; 2014 Dec; 76(12):807-12. PubMed ID: 24824355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting software failures in the MAUDE database: a preliminary analysis.
    Pecoraro F; Luzi D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1098. PubMed ID: 23920872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Legal framework for E‑health products on the European market].
    Lücker V
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2018 Mar; 61(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 29383394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Qualification and classification of medical apps : What should be noted and what is BfArM's contribution?].
    Rämsch-Günther N; Stern S; Lauer W
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2018 Mar; 61(3):304-313. PubMed ID: 29349524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Software as medical devices/medical apps : Tasks, requirements, and experiences from the point of view of a competent authority].
    Terhechte A
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2018 Mar; 61(3):321-327. PubMed ID: 29318338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety-critical software and current standards initiatives.
    Shaw R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 Jul; 44(1):5-22. PubMed ID: 7988112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First experiences with the implementation of the European standard EN 62304 on medical device software for the quality assurance of a radiotherapy unit.
    Höss A; Lampe C; Panse R; Ackermann B; Naumann J; Jäkel O
    Radiat Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9():79. PubMed ID: 24655818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Software validation.
    Wenner H
    Med Device Technol; 1997 Apr; 8(3):22-5. PubMed ID: 10167683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. European Medical Device Directive: impact on nuclear medicine.
    Kuyvenhoven JD; Lahorte P; Persyn K; De Geest E; van Loon PW; Jacobs F; van Rijk PP; Lemahieu I; Dierckx RA
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 11137798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative review of patient safety initiatives for national health information technology.
    Magrabi F; Aarts J; Nohr C; Baker M; Harrison S; Pelayo S; Talmon J; Sittig DF; Coiera E
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):e139-48. PubMed ID: 23266061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].
    Bouchard JP
    Encephale; 2009 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 19250989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unique device identification and traceability for medical software: A major challenge for manufacturers in an ever-evolving marketplace.
    Bianchini E; Francesconi M; Testa M; Tanase M; Gemignani V
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 May; 93():103150. PubMed ID: 30878617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EDI system definition for a European medical device vigilance system.
    Doukidis G; Pallikarakis N; Pangalos G; Vassilacopoulos G; Pramataris K
    Med Inform (Lond); 1996; 21(3):233-44. PubMed ID: 9062886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk management in the design of medical device software systems.
    Jones PL; Jorgens J; Taylor AR; Weber M
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2002; 36(4):237-66. PubMed ID: 12162111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical device regulation for manufacturers.
    McAllister P; Jeswiet J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 14702983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FDA final guidance on software validation.
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2002 Apr; 13(3):20-4. PubMed ID: 12030100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.