134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24190829)
1. [Assessment of mesopic and contrast vision for driving licences: which cut-off values, which methods are appropriate?].
Wilhelm H; Peters T; Durst W; Roelcke S; Quast R; Hütten M; Wilhelm B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Nov; 230(11):1106-13. PubMed ID: 24190829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Measurement of contrast vision: mesopic or photopic vision? : Comparison of different methods for measuring contrast sensitivity within the framework of driving licence regulations].
Bergmann LC; Darius S; Kropf S; Böckelmann I
Ophthalmologe; 2016 Oct; 113(10):844-851. PubMed ID: 27142036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mesopic Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and MP-1 microperimetry in healthy ageing and age-related macular degeneration.
Maynard ML; Zele AJ; Feigl B
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 94(8):e772-e778. PubMed ID: 27225020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Experience in contrast vision testing].
Wilhelm H; Hofmann D; Roelcke S; Quast R
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Nov; 228(11):967-70. PubMed ID: 22072489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Influence of Sex and Age on Contrast Sensitivity Subject to the Applied Method].
Darius S; Bergmann L; Blaschke S; Böckelmann I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2018 Feb; 235(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 28599327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Assessment of contrast vision by the Mars letter contrast sensitivity test - which illumination should be used?].
Durst W; Wilhelm B; Wilhelm H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Sep; 230(9):932-6. PubMed ID: 23986192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
Dougherty BE; Flom RE; Bullimore MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marked dissociation of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity even in normal observers.
Hertenstein H; Bach M; Gross NJ; Beisse F
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 254(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 25921390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.
Kollbaum PS; Jansen ME; Kollbaum EJ; Bullimore MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 91(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 24413274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards.
Osman M; Njeru SM; Hopkins GR; Brown AM
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 98(9):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 34570031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?
Zeri F; Calcatelli P; Funaro E; Martelli M; Naroo SA
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1473-1484. PubMed ID: 28639086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in visual function under mesopic and photopic conditions after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for different stages of keratoconus.
Carballo J; Puell MC; Cuiña R; Vázquez JM; Benitez-del-Castillo JM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):393-402. PubMed ID: 23245506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.
Thakur S; Ichhpujani P; Kumar S; Kaur R; Sood S
Eye (Lond); 2018 Aug; 32(8):1392-1400. PubMed ID: 29755121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mesopic conditions optimise the detection of visual function loss in drivers with simulated media opacity.
Asare FA; Anderson RS; Mulholland PJ; Little JA
Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13165. PubMed ID: 35915231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma.
Richman J; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Spaeth GL
Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 25053760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart for evaluation of visual system in multiple sclerosis patients.
Wender M
Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2007; 41(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 17530576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Multicentric study regarding assessment of the driving ability of LASIK and orthokeratology patients compared with conventionally corrected persons].
Uthoff D; Hebestedt K; Duncker G; Sickenberger H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Mar; 230(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 23508754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normal values for photopic and mesopic letter contrast sensitivity.
Puell MC; Palomo C; Sánchez-Ramos C; Villena C
J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 15523961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
