146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24191504)
1. Histopathological diagnoses of adnexal masses: which parameters are relevant in preoperative assessment?
Terzic M; Dotlic J; Brndusic N; Arsenovic N; Likic I; Ladjevic N; Maricic S; Andrijasevic S
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):700-8. PubMed ID: 24191504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of a risk of malignancy index in clinical approaches to adnexal masses.
Simsek HS; Tokmak A; Ozgu E; Doganay M; Danisman N; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7793-7. PubMed ID: 25292065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of false negative results of subjective ultrasonography assessment of adnexal masses.
Moszynski R; Szpurek D; Szubert S; Sajdak S
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Feb; 84(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 23668055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of malignancy index validity assessment in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with adnexal tumors.
Terzic M; Dotlic J; Likic I; Brndusic N; Pilic I; Ladjevic N; Maricic S; Arsenovic N; Maricic Z
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 23915860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of adnexal masses: correlation between clinical, ultrasound and histopathological findings.
Dotlić J; Terzić M; Likić I; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Oct; 68(10):861-6. PubMed ID: 22165752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Menopausal status strongly influences the utility of predictive models in differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: an external validation of selected diagnostic tools.
Moszynski R; Zywica P; Wojtowicz A; Szubert S; Sajdak S; Stachowiak A; Dyczkowski K; Wygralak M; Szpurek D
Ginekol Pol; 2014 Dec; 85(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 25669057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Oncogynecological aspects of adnexal masses].
Gasparov AS; Zhordania ; Paianidi IuG; Dubinskaia ED
Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2013; (8):9-13. PubMed ID: 24340638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses.
Akdeniz N; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Kale A; Erdemoğlu M; Caca F
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 19480249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].
Smoleń A; Stachowicz N; Czekierowski A; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20476596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current diagnostic approach to patients with adnexal masses: which tools are relevant in routine praxis?
Terzic MM; Dotlic J; Likic I; Ladjevic N; Brndusic N; Arsenovic N; Maricic S; Mihailovic T; Andrijasevic S
Chin J Cancer Res; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 23372342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of malignancy index in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses.
Andersen ES; Knudsen A; Rix P; Johansen B
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 12821350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective study to evaluate the risk malignancy index and its diagnostic implication in patients with suspected ovarian mass.
Dora SK; Dandapat AB; Pande B; Hota JP
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Aug; 10(1):55. PubMed ID: 28806987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Adnexal masses management: a prospective multicentric observational study].
Huchon C; Bats AS; Bensaïd C; Junger M; Nos C; Chatellier G; Lécuru F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1084-90. PubMed ID: 18964176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses.
Terzić M; Dotlić J; Ladjević IL; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Jul; 68(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 21899180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the risk of malignancy index and self-constructed logistic regression models in preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
Yörük P; Dündar O; Yildizhan B; Tütüncü L; Pekin T
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1469-77. PubMed ID: 18809957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of malignancy index in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses.
Ashrafgangooei T; Rezaeezadeh M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1727-30. PubMed ID: 22126553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
