These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24191951)

  • 1. Triggering word learning in children with Language Impairment: the effect of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density.
    McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
    J Child Lang; 2014 Nov; 41(6):1224-48. PubMed ID: 24191951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word recognition and nonword repetition in children with language disorders: the effects of neighborhood density, lexical frequency, and phonotactic probability.
    Rispens J; Baker A; Duinmeijer I
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 25421294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional reorganization in the developing lexicon: separable and changing influences of lexical and phonological variables on children's fast-mapping.
    McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
    J Child Lang; 2013 Mar; 40(2):307-35. PubMed ID: 22261154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.
    Storkel HL; Maekawa J; Hoover JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):933-49. PubMed ID: 20543024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental change is key to understanding primary language impairment: the case of phonotactic probability and nonword repetition.
    McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1579-94. PubMed ID: 23926294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Schwartz RG; Shafer VL; Marton K
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 23472958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment.
    Gray S; Pittman A; Weinhold J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):1011-25. PubMed ID: 24686926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. I remembered the chorm! Word learning abilities of children with and without phonological impairment.
    Hearnshaw S; Baker E; Pomper R; McGregor KK; Edwards J; Munro N
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024; 59(3):913-931. PubMed ID: 37902394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.
    Storkel HL; Armbrüster J; Hogan TP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1175-92. PubMed ID: 17197489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    J Child Lang; 2011 Jun; 38(3):628-43. PubMed ID: 20609282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What can Neighbourhood Density effects tell us about word learning? Insights from a connectionist model of vocabulary development.
    Takac M; Knott A; Stokes S
    J Child Lang; 2017 Mar; 44(2):346-379. PubMed ID: 26884360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1194-212. PubMed ID: 15603471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between phonological short-term memory, receptive vocabulary, and fast mapping in children with specific language impairment.
    Jackson E; Leitao S; Claessen M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2016 Jan; 51(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 26132884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1321-37. PubMed ID: 11776368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonological and lexical effects in verbal recall by children with specific language impairments.
    Coady JA; Mainela-Arnold E; Evans JL
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):144-59. PubMed ID: 23472955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):105-19. PubMed ID: 20004908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of incremental changes in phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children.
    Storkel HL; Bontempo DE; Aschenbrenner AJ; Maekawa J; Lee SY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1689-700. PubMed ID: 23882005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast mapping and word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment in a supported learning context: effect of encoding cues, phonotactic probability, and object familiarity.
    Gray S; Brinkley S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 20966382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Phonotactic Probability on Nonword Repetition and Fast Mapping in 3-Year-Olds With a History of Expressive Language Delay.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Dalton KP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1773-9. PubMed ID: 26540310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Word learning by preschoolers with SLI: effect of phonotactic probability and object familiarity.
    Gray S; Brinkley S; Svetina D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1289-300. PubMed ID: 22411280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.