146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24192201)
1. Model selection for minimum-diameter partitioning.
Brusco MJ; Steinley D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):471-95. PubMed ID: 24192201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bicriterion methods for partitioning dissimilarity matrices.
Brusco MJ; Cradit JD
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):319-32. PubMed ID: 16293203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The k partition-distance problem.
Chen YH
J Comput Biol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):404-17. PubMed ID: 22468708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model.
Ranger J; Kuhn JT
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):388-407. PubMed ID: 23992122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis.
Slaney KL; Maraun MD
Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):376-90. PubMed ID: 19072000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bicriterion cluster analysis.
Delattre M; Hansen P
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 1980 Apr; 2(4):277-91. PubMed ID: 21868904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.
Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative voting consensus method for partitions with variable number of clusters.
Ayad HG; Kamel MS
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Jan; 30(1):160-73. PubMed ID: 18000332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gaussian model-based partitioning using iterated local search.
Brusco MJ; Shireman E; Steinley D; Brudvig S; Cradit JD
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 28130935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. K-balance partitioning: an exact method with applications to generalized structural balance and other psychological contexts.
Brusco M; Steinley D
Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 20515236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.
Magis D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 24016181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining diversity and dispersion criteria for anticlustering: A bicriterion approach.
Brusco MJ; Cradit JD; Steinley D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73(3):375-396. PubMed ID: 31512759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the far reaching effects of using biased estimates of score reliability: an examination of the problem in 20 data analyses.
Becker G
Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 11783552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining multiple clusterings using evidence accumulation.
Fred AL; Jain AK
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Jun; 27(6):835-50. PubMed ID: 15943417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A genetic algorithm using hyper-quadtrees for low-dimensional K-means clustering.
Laszlo M; Mukherjee S
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Apr; 28(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 16566503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Profiling local optima in K-means clustering: developing a diagnostic technique.
Steinley D
Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):178-92. PubMed ID: 16784337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
Chan W; Chan DW
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
Enders CK
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change.
Raudenbush SW; Xiao-Feng L
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 11778679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
