These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24192201)

  • 21. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
    Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stochastic search item selection for factor analytic models.
    Mavridis D; Ntzoufras I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):284-303. PubMed ID: 23837882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modelling dissimilarity: generalizing ultrametric and additive tree representations.
    Hubert L; Arabie P; Meulman J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):103-23. PubMed ID: 11393895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A general class of latent variable models for ordinal manifest variables with covariate effects on the manifest and latent variables.
    Moustaki I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):337-57. PubMed ID: 14633339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variance-Based Cluster Selection Criteria in a K-Means Framework for One-Mode Dissimilarity Data.
    Vera JF; Macías R
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):275-294. PubMed ID: 28194550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A cluster-based factor rotation.
    Yamamoto M; Jennrich RI
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):488-502. PubMed ID: 23398639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Applying the Rasch sampler to identify aberrant responding through person fit statistics under fixed nominal α-level.
    Spoden C; Fleischer J; Leutner D
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 24992251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.
    Sinharay S; Stern HS; Russell D
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):317-29. PubMed ID: 11778675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scale validation via quantifying item validity using the Dm index.
    Taras V; Kline T
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):535-46. PubMed ID: 21117480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated variable weighting in k-means type clustering.
    Huang JZ; Ng MK; Rong H; Li Z
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 May; 27(5):657-68. PubMed ID: 15875789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Exact Method for Partitioning Dichotomous Items Within the Framework of the Monotone Homogeneity Model.
    Brusco MJ; Köhn HF; Steinley D
    Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):949-67. PubMed ID: 25850618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. K-means clustering: a half-century synthesis.
    Steinley D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):1-34. PubMed ID: 16709277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New approaches to missing data in psychological research: introduction to the special section.
    West SG
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):315-6. PubMed ID: 11778674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of exact methods for the multiple subset maximum cardinality selection problem.
    Brusco MJ; Köhn HF; Steinley D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):194-213. PubMed ID: 27027582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bootstrapping the estimated latent distribution of the two-parameter latent trait model.
    Knott M; Tzamourani P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):175-91. PubMed ID: 17535586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Text mining biomedical literature for discovering gene-to-gene relationships: a comparative study of algorithms.
    Liu Y; Navathe SB; Civera J; Dasigi V; Ram A; Ciliax BJ; Dingledine R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2005; 2(1):62-76. PubMed ID: 17044165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cluster analysis: an alternative method for covariate selection in population pharmacokinetic modeling.
    Semmar N; Bruguerolle B; Boullu-Ciocca S; Simon N
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2005 Aug; 32(3-4):333-58. PubMed ID: 16307207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.
    Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Identifying clusters in genomics data by recursive partitioning.
    Nilsen G; Borgan O; Liestøl K; Lingjærde OC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Oct; 12(5):637-52. PubMed ID: 23942354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.