465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24192662)
1. Which intrauterine growth restricted fetuses at term benefit from early labour induction? A secondary analysis of the DIGITAT randomised trial.
Tajik P; van Wyk L; Boers KE; le Cessie S; Zafarmand MH; Roumen F; van der Post JA; Porath M; van Pampus MG; Spaanderdam ME; Kwee A; Duvekot JJ; Bremer HA; Delemarre FM; Bloemenkamp KW; de Groot CJ; Willekes C; van Lith JM; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW; Scherjon SA;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jan; 172():20-5. PubMed ID: 24192662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic analysis comparing induction of labour and expectant management for intrauterine growth restriction at term (DIGITAT trial).
Vijgen SM; Boers KE; Opmeer BC; Bijlenga D; Bekedam DJ; Bloemenkamp KW; de Boer K; Bremer HA; le Cessie S; Delemarre FM; Duvekot JJ; Hasaart TH; Kwee A; van Lith JM; van Meir CA; van Pampus MG; van der Post JA; Rijken M; Roumen FJ; van der Salm PC; Spaanderman ME; Willekes C; Wijnen EJ; Mol BW; Scherjon SA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 23910171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT).
Boers KE; Vijgen SM; Bijlenga D; van der Post JA; Bekedam DJ; Kwee A; van der Salm PC; van Pampus MG; Spaanderman ME; de Boer K; Duvekot JJ; Bremer HA; Hasaart TH; Delemarre FM; Bloemenkamp KW; van Meir CA; Willekes C; Wijnen EJ; Rijken M; le Cessie S; Roumen FJ; Thornton JG; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Scherjon SA;
BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c7087. PubMed ID: 21177352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.
Bernardes TP; Broekhuijsen K; Koopmans CM; Boers KE; van Wyk L; Tajik P; van Pampus MG; Scherjon SA; Mol BW; Franssen MT; van den Berg PP; Groen H
BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1501-8. PubMed ID: 27173131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT.
Boers KE; van Wyk L; van der Post JA; Kwee A; van Pampus MG; Spaanderdam ME; Duvekot JJ; Bremer HA; Delemarre FM; Bloemenkamp KW; de Groot CJ; Willekes C; Rijken M; Roumen FJ; Thornton JG; van Lith JM; Mol BW; le Cessie S; Scherjon SA;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 206(4):344.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22342897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Qualitative venous Doppler flow waveform analysis in preterm intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses with ARED flow in the umbilical artery--correlation with short-term outcome.
Schwarze A; Gembruch U; Krapp M; Katalinic A; Germer U; Axt-Fliedner R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 15912468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrauterine growth restriction at term: induction or spontaneous labour? Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): a pilot study.
van den Hove MM; Willekes C; Roumen FJ; Scherjon SA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Mar; 125(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 16054286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic role of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses.
Soregaroli M; Bonera R; Danti L; Dinolfo D; Taddei F; Valcamonico A; Frusca T
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Mar; 11(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 12380678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expectant management of severe preterm preeclampsia: is intrauterine growth restriction an indication for immediate delivery?
Chammas MF; Nguyen TM; Li MA; Nuwayhid BS; Castro LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 11035325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Middle cerebral/umbilical artery resistance index ratio as sensitive parameter for fetal well-being and neonatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia: case-control study.
Ebrashy A; Azmy O; Ibrahim M; Waly M; Edris A
Croat Med J; 2005 Oct; 46(5):821-5. PubMed ID: 16158478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Koopmans CM; Bijlenga D; Groen H; Vijgen SM; Aarnoudse JG; Bekedam DJ; van den Berg PP; de Boer K; Burggraaff JM; Bloemenkamp KW; Drogtrop AP; Franx A; de Groot CJ; Huisjes AJ; Kwee A; van Loon AJ; Lub A; Papatsonis DN; van der Post JA; Roumen FJ; Scheepers HC; Willekes C; Mol BW; van Pampus MG;
Lancet; 2009 Sep; 374(9694):979-988. PubMed ID: 19656558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of fetal growth restriction on latency in the setting of expectant management of preeclampsia.
McKinney D; Boyd H; Langager A; Oswald M; Pfister A; Warshak CR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):395.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26767794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT.
Boers KE; Bijlenga D; Mol BW; LeCessie S; Birnie E; van Pampus MG; Stigter RH; Bloemenkamp KW; van Meir CA; van der Post JA; Bekedam DJ; Ribbert LS; Drogtrop AP; van der Salm PC; Huisjes AJ; Willekes C; Roumen FJ; Scheepers HC; de Boer K; Duvekot JJ; Thornton JG; Scherjon SA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():12. PubMed ID: 17623077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term: the HYPITAT trial.
Koopmans CM; Bijlenga D; Aarnoudse JG; van Beek E; Bekedam DJ; van den Berg PP; Burggraaff JM; Birnie E; Bloemenkamp KW; Drogtrop AP; Franx A; de Groot CJ; Huisjes AJ; Kwee A; le Cessie S; van Loon AJ; Mol BW; van der Post JA; Roumen FJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; Stigter RH; Willekes C; van Pampus MG
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():14. PubMed ID: 17662114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perinatal outcomes and maternal clinical characteristics in IUGR with absent or reversed end-diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery.
Jang DG; Jo YS; Lee SJ; Kim N; Lee GS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jul; 284(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 20658142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neonatal morbidity and mortality in intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) pregnancies is predicated upon prenatal diagnosis of clinical severity.
Marconi AM; Ronzoni S; Vailati S; Bozzetti P; Morabito A; Battaglia FC
Reprod Sci; 2009 Apr; 16(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 19087980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT-II): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Langenveld J; Broekhuijsen K; van Baaren GJ; van Pampus MG; van Kaam AH; Groen H; Porath M; Oudijk MA; Bloemenkamp KW; Groot CJ; van Beek E; van Huizen ME; Oosterbaan HP; Willekes C; Wijnen-Duvekot EJ; Franssen MT; Perquin DA; Sporken JM; Woiski MD; Bremer HA; Papatsonis DN; Brons JT; Kaplan M; Nij Bijvanck BW; Mol BW;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2011 Jul; 11():50. PubMed ID: 21736705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects on (neuro)developmental and behavioral outcome at 2 years of age of induced labor compared with expectant management in intrauterine growth-restricted infants: long-term outcomes of the DIGITAT trial.
van Wyk L; Boers KE; van der Post JA; van Pampus MG; van Wassenaer AG; van Baar AL; Spaanderdam ME; Becker JH; Kwee A; Duvekot JJ; Bremer HA; Delemarre FM; Bloemenkamp KW; de Groot CJ; Willekes C; Roumen FJ; van Lith JM; Mol BW; le Cessie S; Scherjon SA;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):406.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22444791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
