92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24192793)
1. Comparison of the five sonographic morphology scoring systems for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumors.
Klangsin S; Suntharasaj T; Suwanrath C; Kor-Anantakul O; Prasartwanakit V
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 76(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 24192793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic morphology scores (SMS) for differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian tumor.
Wanapirak C; Nimitwongsakul S; Tongsong T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jan; 84(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11281497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New sonographic morphology score for the differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors.
Shen ZY; He AQ; Xia GL; Wu MF; Li J; Ding YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1000-12. PubMed ID: 27125323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study.
Ferrazzi E; Zanetta G; Dordoni D; Berlanda N; Mezzopane R; Lissoni AA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 10(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9339526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic importance of the sonographic scoring system in differentiating between malignant and benign ovarian tumors].
Durdević S
Med Pregl; 2001; 54(3-4):161-5. PubMed ID: 11759208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new sonomorphologic scoring system (Mainz Score) for the assessment of ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasonography. Part I: A comparison between the scoring-system and the assessment by an experienced sonographer.
Merz E; Weber G; Bahlmann F; Kiesslich R
Ultraschall Med; 1998 Jun; 19(3):99-107. PubMed ID: 9744040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic morphology scores (SMS) for differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Wanapirak C; Srisupundit K; Tongsong T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(3):407-10. PubMed ID: 17059332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new sonomorphologic scoring-system (Mainz score) for the assessment of ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasonography. Part II: A comparison between the scoring-system and the assessment by an experienced sonographer in postmenopausal women.
Weber G; Merz E; Bahlmann F; Leber AM
Ultraschall Med; 1999 Feb; 20(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 10226339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative sonographic features of borderline ovarian tumors.
Exacoustos C; Romanini ME; Rinaldo D; Amoroso C; Szabolcs B; Zupi E; Arduini D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 25(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 15619309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic morphological pattern in the pre-operative prediction of ovarian masses.
Benjapibal M; Sunsaneevitayakul P; Phatihattakorn C; Suphanit I; Iamurairat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Apr; 86(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 12757077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian mass for predicting malignancy in pregnant women.
Lee SJ; Kim YH; Lee MY; Ko HS; Oh SY; Seol HJ; Kim JW; Ahn KH; Na S; Seong WJ; Kim HS; Park CW; Park JS; Jun JK; Won HS; Kim MY; Hwang HS; Lee SM
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 163(2):385-391. PubMed ID: 34561098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian tumours by ultrasonography.
Tuladhar AS; Pradhan S
Nepal Med Coll J; 2005 Dec; 7(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 16519078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing clinical performance of gynecology residents: sonographic evaluation of adnexal masses based on morphological scoring systems.
Lee TS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kang SB; Lee HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):776-9. PubMed ID: 16308902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Sonographic characterization, Doppler ultrasonography and tumor markers in the diagnosis of malignancy of ovarian masses].
Gramellini D; Rutolo S; Verrotti C; Piantelli G; Fieni S; Vadora E
Minerva Ginecol; 2001 Feb; 53(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11279390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A morphology index based on sonographic findings in ovarian cancer.
DePriest PD; Shenson D; Fried A; Hunter JE; Andrews SJ; Gallion HH; Pavlik EJ; Kryscio RJ; van Nagell JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Oct; 51(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 8244178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of ultrasound pattern recognition by expert operators to identify borderline ovarian tumors: a study of diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement.
Yazbek J; Ameye L; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Valentin L; Holland TK; Van Holsbeke C; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 19746450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Sonographic diagnosis of presumed benign ovarian tumors].
Marret H; Cayrol M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Dec; 42(8):730-43. PubMed ID: 24200073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.
Brown DL; Doubilet PM; Miller FH; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Benson CB; Lerner MH
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 9646799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Studies on angiogenesis in the benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms with the use of color and pulsed Doppler sonography and serum CA-125, CA-19.9, CA-72.4 and vascular endothelial growth factor measurements.
Czekierdowski A
Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2002; 57(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 12898913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A critical evaluation of transvaginal Doppler studies, transvaginal sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and CA 125 in detecting ovarian cancer.
Hata K; Hata T; Manabe A; Sugimura K; Kitao M
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):922-6. PubMed ID: 1448260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
