These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24193721)

  • 1. Regulatory use of ecotoxicity statistics: a US perspective.
    Harrass MC
    Ecotoxicology; 1996 Jun; 5(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 24193721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical analysis of regulatory ecotoxicity tests.
    Isnard P; Flammarion P; Roman G; Babut M; Bastien P; Bintein S; Esserméant L; Férard JF; Gallotti-Schmitt S; Saouter E; Saroli M; Thiébaud H; Tomassone R; Vindimian E
    Chemosphere; 2001 Nov; 45(4-5):659-69. PubMed ID: 11680762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation and comparison of the relationship between NOEC and EC10 or EC20 values in chronic Daphnia toxicity testing.
    Beasley A; Belanger SE; Brill JL; Otter RR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2378-84. PubMed ID: 26033640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ecotoxicological assessment of effluents in the Basque country (Northern Spain) by acute and chronic toxicity tests using Daphnia magna straus.
    Rodriguez P; Martinez-Madrid M; Cid A
    Ecotoxicology; 2006 Oct; 15(7):559-72. PubMed ID: 17021961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test of significant toxicity: a statistical application for assessing whether an effluent or site water is truly toxic.
    Denton DL; Diamond J; Zheng L
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 May; 30(5):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21305584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The drive to ban the NOEC/LOEC in favor of ECx is misguided and misinformed.
    Green JW; Springer TA; Staveley JP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 22991182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toxicity bioassays for ecological risk assessment in arid and semiarid ecosystems.
    Markwiese JT; Ryti RT; Hooten MM; Michael DI; Hlohowskyj I
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2001; 168():43-98. PubMed ID: 12882227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time to get off the fence: the need for definitive international guidance on statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data.
    van Dam RA; Harford AJ; Warne MS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 22308052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ecosystem services as assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment.
    Munns WR; Rea AW; Suter GW; Martin L; Blake-Hedges L; Crk T; Davis C; Ferreira G; Jordan S; Mahoney M; Barron MG
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jul; 12(3):522-8. PubMed ID: 26331725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models.
    Jager T; Heugens EH; Kooijman SA
    Ecotoxicology; 2006 Apr; 15(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 16739032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An assessment of the application factor used to derive the saltwater acute ambient water quality copper criterion.
    Arnold WR; Cotsifas JS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Apr; 4(2):252-4. PubMed ID: 17994917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Residue-based mercury dose-response in fish: an analysis using lethality-equivalent test endpoints.
    Dillon T; Beckvar N; Kern J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 Nov; 29(11):2559-65. PubMed ID: 20886502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceutical drug substances--conceptual considerations.
    Länge R; Dietrich D
    Toxicol Lett; 2002 May; 131(1-2):97-104. PubMed ID: 11988362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extrapolation Factors for Characterizing Freshwater Ecotoxicity Effects.
    Aurisano N; Albizzati PF; Hauschild M; Fantke P
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2568-2582. PubMed ID: 31393623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems.
    De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 18774172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative sensitivity of the cnidarian Exaiptasia pallida and a standard toxicity test suite: testing whole effluents intended for ocean disposal.
    Howe PL; Reichelt-Brushett AJ; Krassoi R; Micevska T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Sep; 22(17):13225-33. PubMed ID: 25940467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental properties and aquatic hazard assessment of anionic surfactants: physico-chemical, environmental fate and ecotoxicity properties.
    Könnecker G; Regelmann J; Belanger S; Gamon K; Sedlak R
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 Sep; 74(6):1445-60. PubMed ID: 21550112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages and challenges associated with implementing an ecosystem services approach to ecological risk assessment for chemicals.
    Maltby L; van den Brink PJ; Faber JH; Marshall S
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 621():1342-1351. PubMed ID: 29054617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.