369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24194394)
1. Comparison of microarrays and RNA-seq for gene expression analyses of dose-response experiments.
Black MB; Parks BB; Pluta L; Chu TM; Allen BC; Wolfinger RD; Thomas RS
Toxicol Sci; 2014 Feb; 137(2):385-403. PubMed ID: 24194394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing next-generation sequencing and microarray technologies in a toxicological study of the effects of aristolochic acid on rat kidneys.
Su Z; Li Z; Chen T; Li QZ; Fang H; Ding D; Ge W; Ning B; Hong H; Perkins RG; Tong W; Shi L
Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1486-93. PubMed ID: 21834575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RNA-Seq provides new insights in the transcriptome responses induced by the carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene.
van Delft J; Gaj S; Lienhard M; Albrecht MW; Kirpiy A; Brauers K; Claessen S; Lizarraga D; Lehrach H; Herwig R; Kleinjans J
Toxicol Sci; 2012 Dec; 130(2):427-39. PubMed ID: 22889811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Genomics Platform and Statistical Filtering on Transcriptional Benchmark Doses (BMD) and Multiple Approaches for Selection of Chemical Point of Departure (PoD).
Webster AF; Chepelev N; Gagné R; Kuo B; Recio L; Williams A; Yauk CL
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136764. PubMed ID: 26313361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. RNA-Seq versus oligonucleotide array assessment of dose-dependent TCDD-elicited hepatic gene expression in mice.
Nault R; Fader KA; Zacharewski T
BMC Genomics; 2015 May; 16(1):373. PubMed ID: 25958198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RNA-Seq-based toxicogenomic assessment of fresh frozen and formalin-fixed tissues yields similar mechanistic insights.
Auerbach SS; Phadke DP; Mav D; Holmgren S; Gao Y; Xie B; Shin JH; Shah RR; Merrick BA; Tice RR
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jul; 35(7):766-80. PubMed ID: 25378103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. RNA sequencing atopic dermatitis transcriptome profiling provides insights into novel disease mechanisms with potential therapeutic implications.
Suárez-Fariñas M; Ungar B; Correa da Rosa J; Ewald DA; Rozenblit M; Gonzalez J; Xu H; Zheng X; Peng X; Estrada YD; Dillon SR; Krueger JG; Guttman-Yassky E
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2015 May; 135(5):1218-27. PubMed ID: 25840722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between RNA-Seq and microarrays results using TCGA data.
Chen L; Sun F; Yang X; Jin Y; Shi M; Wang L; Shi Y; Zhan C; Wang Q
Gene; 2017 Sep; 628():200-204. PubMed ID: 28734892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pooling samples within microarray studies: a comparative analysis of rat liver transcription response to prototypical toxicants.
Jolly RA; Goldstein KM; Wei T; Gao H; Chen P; Huang S; Colet JM; Ryan TP; Thomas CE; Estrem ST
Physiol Genomics; 2005 Aug; 22(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 15914576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Next-generation sequencing facilitates quantitative analysis of wild-type and Nrl(-/-) retinal transcriptomes.
Brooks MJ; Rajasimha HK; Roger JE; Swaroop A
Mol Vis; 2011; 17():3034-54. PubMed ID: 22162623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the importance of small changes in RNA expression.
St Laurent G; Shtokalo D; Tackett MR; Yang Z; Vyatkin Y; Milos PM; Seilheimer B; McCaffrey TA; Kapranov P
Methods; 2013 Sep; 63(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 23563143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large scale real-time PCR validation on gene expression measurements from two commercial long-oligonucleotide microarrays.
Wang Y; Barbacioru C; Hyland F; Xiao W; Hunkapiller KL; Blake J; Chan F; Gonzalez C; Zhang L; Samaha RR
BMC Genomics; 2006 Mar; 7():59. PubMed ID: 16551369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long versus short oligonucleotide microarrays for the study of gene expression in nonhuman primates.
Walker SJ; Wang Y; Grant KA; Chan F; Hellmann GM
J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Apr; 152(1-2):179-89. PubMed ID: 16253343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a toxicological gene array and quantitative assessment of this technology.
Bartosiewicz M; Trounstine M; Barker D; Johnston R; Buckpitt A
Arch Biochem Biophys; 2000 Apr; 376(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 10729191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal concordance between apical and transcriptional points of departure for chemical risk assessment.
Thomas RS; Wesselkamper SC; Wang NC; Zhao QJ; Petersen DD; Lambert JC; Cote I; Yang L; Healy E; Black MB; Clewell HJ; Allen BC; Andersen ME
Toxicol Sci; 2013 Jul; 134(1):180-94. PubMed ID: 23596260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hepatic gene expression changes throughout the day in the Fischer rat: implications for toxicogenomic experiments.
Boorman GA; Blackshear PE; Parker JS; Lobenhofer EK; Malarkey DE; Vallant MK; Gerken DK; Irwin RD
Toxicol Sci; 2005 Jul; 86(1):185-93. PubMed ID: 15814895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A nested parallel experiment demonstrates differences in intensity-dependence between RNA-seq and microarrays.
Robinson DG; Wang JY; Storey JD
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Nov; 43(20):e131. PubMed ID: 26130709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advantages of RNA-seq compared to RNA microarrays for transcriptome profiling of anterior cruciate ligament tears.
Rai MF; Tycksen ED; Sandell LJ; Brophy RH
J Orthop Res; 2018 Jan; 36(1):484-497. PubMed ID: 28749036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of microarray-based analysis of gene expression in the field of toxicogenomics.
Mei N; Fuscoe JC; Lobenhofer EK; Guo L
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 597():227-41. PubMed ID: 20013237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq.
Külahoglu C; Bräutigam A
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1158():71-91. PubMed ID: 24792045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]