149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24195399)
1. [Introduction of accompanying documents on the new EMC standard of medical electrical equipment].
Wang W
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 37(4):287-90. PubMed ID: 24195399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Study on selection of the EMC test system of medical electrical equipment].
Wang W
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 35(6):449-52. PubMed ID: 22379776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experience in designing equipment for testing technical means by the interference stability requirements].
Tukhas VA; Pozhidaev SV
Med Tekh; 2001; (3):12-4. PubMed ID: 11515258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AHA supports health manufacturers' request for FCC waiver of warning label for hospital digital equipment.
Kaunitz KK; diMonda R
Health Law Vigil; 1980 Nov; 3(23):1-2. PubMed ID: 10248612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Safety of medical electrical equipment".
Oliver DE
Br Med J; 1979 Jan; 1(6155):57. PubMed ID: 760960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Meet the challenge of the implementation of the EMC standard for medical electrical equipment].
Pan Y; Lin W; Liu J
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 35(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 21706802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use and recognition of consensus standards in US premarket submissions.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1999 Mar; 10(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 10387610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Best practice for electromagnetic compatibility.
Med Device Technol; 2005 Jun; 16(5):56-7. PubMed ID: 15984548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Designing medical equipment for electromagnetic compatibility.
Kirk S
Med Device Technol; 1992 May; 3(4):42-9. PubMed ID: 10147988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applying the new medical collateral EMC standard EN60601-1-2:2001.
Bearpark J
Med Device Technol; 2005 Sep; 16(7):24-5. PubMed ID: 16259156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Solving electromagnetic compatibility problems in medical equipment.
Kirk S
Med Device Technol; 1992; 3(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 10171584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physicians and medical electronic equipment: a critical review of our modus operandi.
Rios JC; Shaffer M
Am Heart J; 1974 Mar; 87(3):397-9. PubMed ID: 4812377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. US contributions to international standards for medical electrical equipment.
Ibbott GS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Mar; 9(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 22386172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Will good manufacturing practice produce acceptable equipment?
Whelpton D
J Med Eng Technol; 1984; 8(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 6716442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety by design in electromedical equipment: Part I.
Loznen SP
Med Device Technol; 1995 Nov; 6(9):24-30. PubMed ID: 10158129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meeting the requirements for medical equipment EMC: a test house perspective.
Gubisch RW
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 10194566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Introduction to medical electronics. VII. Surgical equipment--anesthetic equipment, electrical knives and a warmer].
Sawa T; Ikeuchi H; Tomori S; Ito Y
Kango Gijutsu; 1983 Mar; 29(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 6551531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical indicators in clinical nursing research or why do I need to know what?
Abbey JC
J Adv Nurs; 1977 May; 2(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 586226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety by design in electromedical equipment, Part II.
Loznen SP
Med Device Technol; 1995 Dec; 6(10):28-30. PubMed ID: 10158121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of the revised electromagnetic compatibility standard.
Bozec D; Hayes DJ
Med Device Technol; 2004 Oct; 15(8):33-4, 36. PubMed ID: 16225272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
