265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24196418)
1. Diversity in cochlear morphology and its influence on cochlear implant electrode position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Snel-Bongers J; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e9-20. PubMed ID: 24196418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting depth of electrode insertion by cochlear measurements on computed tomography scans.
Angeli SI; Goncalves S
Laryngoscope; 2016 Jul; 126(7):1656-61. PubMed ID: 26536390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the implanted cochlear implant electrode by CT scanning with three-dimensional reconstruction.
Kong WJ; Cheng HM; Ma H; Wang YJ; Han P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 132(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 22053975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear coordinates in regard to cochlear implantation: a clinically individually applicable 3 dimensional CT-based method.
Verbist BM; Joemai RM; Briaire JJ; Teeuwisse WM; Veldkamp WJ; Frijns JH
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 20393379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Plain X-ray for locations of intracochlear electrode arrays during cochlear implantation].
Tan S; Tang A; Chen P; Yin S; Fang Q; Cai H; Huang J
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 26(13):598-600. PubMed ID: 23002644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Electrode Position on Behavioral and Electrophysiologic Measurements in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implants.
Collins A; Foghsgaard S; Druce E; Margani V; Mejia O; O'Leary S
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 38238914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes.
Escudé B; James C; Deguine O; Cochard N; Eter E; Fraysse B
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():27-33. PubMed ID: 17063008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Image examination of postoperative evaluation for the cochlear implanted electrode].
Kong WJ; Ma H; Han P; Yue JX; Xiong XG; Zhu LX; Dai CK
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 15195588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of intracochlear electrode position and correlation with behavioural thresholds in CII and 90K cochlear implants.
Filipo R; Mancini P; Panebianco V; Viccaro M; Covelli E; Vergari V; Passariello R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 128(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 18274915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Role of Electrode Placement in Bilateral Simultaneously Cochlear-Implanted Adult Patients.
De Seta D; Nguyen Y; Bonnard D; Ferrary E; Godey B; Bakhos D; Mondain M; Deguine O; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D; Mosnier I
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 155(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 27165685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A new method for REZ-1 cochlear implant electrode array insertion].
Du Q; Wang ZM
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 44(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 19954027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The application of multi-slice CT three-dimensioned reconstruction in the cochlear implantation].
Ma R; Zhao N; Li W; Tian Y; Feng S; Wang Z; Jiang X
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 May; 29(10):878-81. PubMed ID: 26595998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of cochlear implant electrode position on performance.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Verbist BM; Muurling TJ; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(3):202-11. PubMed ID: 25924706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of the electrode position by CBCT following cochlear implantation].
Fan XT; Wang N; Hou LX; Wang Z; Zhang H; Xu AT
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):566-570. PubMed ID: 31434368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrode migration in cochlear implant patients: not an exception.
van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Briaire JJ; Joemai RM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(5):275-81. PubMed ID: 22627581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
