These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Fitting model-based psychometric functions to simultaneity and temporal-order judgment data: MATLAB and R routines. Alcalá-Quintana R; García-Pérez MA Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):972-98. PubMed ID: 23572250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009). García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1155-78. PubMed ID: 20436208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Do's and Don'ts of Psychophysical Methods for Interpretability of Psychometric Functions and Their Descriptors. García-Pérez MÁ; Alcalá-Quintana R Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E56. PubMed ID: 31868158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models. Ulrich R Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cautionary note on the use of the adaptive up-down method. García-Pérez MA J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2098-107. PubMed ID: 21973364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: the quick TvC method. Lesmes LA; Jeon ST; Lu ZL; Dosher BA Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3160-76. PubMed ID: 16782167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Klein SA Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On measuring psychometric functions: a comparison of the constant-stimulus and adaptive up-down methods. Dai H J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3135-9. PubMed ID: 8550938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonparametric tests for equality of psychometric functions. García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2226-2255. PubMed ID: 29218586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive stimulus selection for multi-alternative psychometric functions with lapses. Bak JH; Pillow JW J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):4. PubMed ID: 30458512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers. Jäkel F; Wichmann FA J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relation between confidence in yes-no and forced-choice tasks. McKenzie CR; Wixted JT; Noelle DC; Gyurjyan G J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Mar; 130(1):140-55. PubMed ID: 11293457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination processes in comparative and equality judgements: data and models. Dyjas O; Ulrich R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1121-50. PubMed ID: 24295428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Order effects in two-alternative forced-choice tasks invalidate adaptive threshold estimates. García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):2168-2187. PubMed ID: 32232736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Strasburger H Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1348-55. PubMed ID: 11800461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data. Kaernbach C Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11800464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]