These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24197558)

  • 1. Investigation of the bacterial load and antibiotic susceptibility of dental units.
    Güngör ND; Kadaifçiler DG; Peker OÖ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Mar; 186(3):1847-53. PubMed ID: 24197558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molecular analysis for bacterial contamination in dental unit water lines.
    Watanabe A; Tamaki N; Matsuyama M; Kokeguchi S
    New Microbiol; 2016 Apr; 39(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 27196554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of microbial contamination and distribution of sulphate-reducing bacteria in dental units.
    Dogruöz N; Ilhan-Sungur E; Göksay D; Türetgen I
    Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Jan; 184(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 21384117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines and effect on quality of indoor air.
    Kadaifciler DG; Cotuk A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Jun; 186(6):3431-44. PubMed ID: 24469014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines in Istanbul, Turkey.
    Göksay D; Cotuk A; Zeybek Z
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Dec; 147(1-3):265-9. PubMed ID: 18210208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental unit waterlines: biofilms, disinfection and recurrence.
    Meiller TF; Depaola LG; Kelley JI; Baqui AA; Turng BF; Falkler WA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jan; 130(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 9919033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Microbiological and Free-Living Protozoa Contamination in Dental Unit Waterlines.
    Spagnolo AM; Sartini M; Cave DD; Casini B; Tuvo B; Cristina ML
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(15):. PubMed ID: 31344972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initial waterline contamination by
    Baudet A; Lizon J; Florentin A; Mortier É
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0396223. PubMed ID: 38652098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbiological evaluation and antibiotic susceptibility of dental unit water systems in general dental practice.
    Uzel A; Cogulu D; Oncag O
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2008 Feb; 6(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18205653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental Unit Waterlines in Quito and Caracas Contaminated with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria: A Potential Health Risk in Dental Practice.
    Castellano Realpe OJ; Gutiérrez JC; Sierra DA; Pazmiño Martínez LA; Prado Palacios YY; Echeverría G; de Waard JH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32244267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants.
    Tuttlebee CM; O'Donnell MJ; Keane CT; Russell RJ; Sullivan DJ; Falkiner F; Coleman DC
    J Hosp Infect; 2002 Nov; 52(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 12419272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of acoustic waves in preventing Streptococcus mutans adhesion on dental unit water line.
    Pantanella F; Schippa S; Solimini A; Rosa L; Bettucci A; Berlutti F
    Ann Ig; 2019; 31(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30714608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cultural and Molecular Evidence of Legionella spp. Colonization in Dental Unit Waterlines: Which Is the Best Method for Risk Assessment?
    Ditommaso S; Giacomuzzi M; Ricciardi E; Zotti CM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Feb; 13(2):211. PubMed ID: 26861373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bacterial biofilm prevalence in dental unit waterlines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bayani M; Raisolvaezin K; Almasi-Hashiani A; Mirhoseini SH
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):158. PubMed ID: 36934281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between Two Types of Dental Unit Waterlines: How Evaluation of Microbiological Contamination Can Support Risk Containment.
    Lizzadro J; Mazzotta M; Girolamini L; Dormi A; Pellati T; Cristino S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30682855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three key factors influencing the bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines: a 6-year survey from 2012 to 2017.
    Ji XY; Fei CN; Zhang Y; Liu J; Liu H; Song J
    Int Dent J; 2019 Jun; 69(3):192-199. PubMed ID: 30565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa of dental unit waterlines and its relationship with other bacteria: suggestions for microbiological monitoring.
    Ditommaso S; Giacomuzzi M; Ricciardi E; Memoli G; Zotti CM
    J Water Health; 2019 Aug; 17(4):532-539. PubMed ID: 31313992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines.
    Szymańska J; Sitkowska J
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 May; 185(5):3603-11. PubMed ID: 22899458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Isolation of an unusual fungus in treated dental unit waterlines.
    Porteous NB; Redding SW; Thompson EH; Grooters AM; De Hoog S; Sutton DA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Jul; 134(7):853-8. PubMed ID: 12892442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of dental unit waterline biofilms in the 21st century.
    O'Donnell MJ; Boyle MA; Russell RJ; Coleman DC
    Future Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 6(10):1209-26. PubMed ID: 22004039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.