780 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24197771)
1. Screening and primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a review of sex-specific and site-specific differences.
Massat NJ; Moss SM; Halloran SP; Duffy SW
J Med Screen; 2013; 20(3):125-48. PubMed ID: 24197771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Hol L; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; van Dekken H; Reijerink JC; van der Togt AC; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ
Gut; 2010 Jan; 59(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19671542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.
Tinmouth J; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Allison JE
Gut; 2015 Aug; 64(8):1327-37. PubMed ID: 26041750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing: a French population-based controlled study (Wintzenheim trial).
Denis B; Gendre I; Aman F; Ribstein F; Maurin P; Perrin P
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 45(18):3282-90. PubMed ID: 19665368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence for colorectal cancer screening.
Bretthauer M
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 20833346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colorectal cancer screening.
Bretthauer M
J Intern Med; 2011 Aug; 270(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 21575082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT).
Hoff G; Grotmol T; Thiis-Evensen E; Bretthauer M; Gondal G; Vatn MH
Gut; 2004 Sep; 53(9):1329-33. PubMed ID: 15306594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A population-based estimate of the extent of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario.
Rabeneck L; Paszat LF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1141-4. PubMed ID: 15180738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.
Segnan N; Senore C; Andreoni B; Arrigoni A; Bisanti L; Cardelli A; Castiglione G; Crosta C; DiPlacido R; Ferrari A; Ferraris R; Ferrero F; Fracchia M; Gasperoni S; Malfitana G; Recchia S; Risio M; Rizzetto M; Saracco G; Spandre M; Turco D; Turco P; Zappa M;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 15741571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for colorectal cancer: comparison of perceived test burden of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Hol L; de Jonge V; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; Looman CW; van Vuuren AJ; Reijerink JC; Habbema JD; Essink-Bot ML; Kuipers EJ
Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jul; 46(11):2059-66. PubMed ID: 20621736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact on colorectal cancer mortality of screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test.
Zorzi M; Fedeli U; Schievano E; Bovo E; Guzzinati S; Baracco S; Fedato C; Saugo M; Dei Tos AP
Gut; 2015 May; 64(5):784-90. PubMed ID: 25179811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of a brush-sampling fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin with a sensitive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Smith A; Young GP; Cole SR; Bampton P
Cancer; 2006 Nov; 107(9):2152-9. PubMed ID: 16998938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reappraisal of the options for colorectal cancer screening in England.
Whyte S; Chilcott J; Halloran S
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Sep; 14(9):e547-61. PubMed ID: 22390210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased uptake and improved outcomes of bowel cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: results from a pilot study within the national screening programme in England.
Moss S; Mathews C; Day TJ; Smith S; Seaman HE; Snowball J; Halloran SP
Gut; 2017 Sep; 66(9):1631-1644. PubMed ID: 27267903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening.
Segnan N; Senore C; Andreoni B; Azzoni A; Bisanti L; Cardelli A; Castiglione G; Crosta C; Ederle A; Fantin A; Ferrari A; Fracchia M; Ferrero F; Gasperoni S; Recchia S; Risio M; Rubeca T; Saracco G; Zappa M;
Gastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 132(7):2304-12. PubMed ID: 17570205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lower risk of advanced neoplasia among patients with a previous negative result from a fecal test for colorectal cancer.
Denters MJ; Deutekom M; Bossuyt PM; Stroobants AK; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastroenterology; 2012 Mar; 142(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 22108194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nottingham trial of faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer: a 20-year follow-up.
Scholefield JH; Moss SM; Mangham CM; Whynes DK; Hardcastle JD
Gut; 2012 Jul; 61(7):1036-40. PubMed ID: 22052062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
