BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24198681)

  • 1. A comparison of kinematics and performance measures of two rowing ergometers.
    Steer RR; McGregor AH; Bull AM
    J Sports Sci Med; 2006; 5(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 24198681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal changes in the spinal kinematics of oarswomen during step testing.
    McGregor AH; Patankar ZS; Bull AM
    J Sports Sci Med; 2007; 6(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 24149221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of rowing technique at different stroke rates: a description of sequencing, force production and kinematics.
    McGregor AH; Bull AM; Byng-Maddick R
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 25(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 15346237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kinematics of spinal motion during prolonged rowing.
    Holt PJ; Bull AM; Cashman PM; McGregor AH
    Int J Sports Med; 2003 Nov; 24(8):597-602. PubMed ID: 14598197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring spinal motion in rowers: the use of an electromagnetic device.
    Bull AM; McGregor AH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Dec; 15(10):772-6. PubMed ID: 11050361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spinal kinematics in elite oarswomen during a routine physiological "step test".
    McGregor AH; Patankar ZS; Bull AM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2005 Jun; 37(6):1014-20. PubMed ID: 15947728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in rowing technique over a routine one hour low intensity high volume training session.
    Mackenzie HA; Bull AM; McGregor AH
    J Sports Sci Med; 2008; 7(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 24149955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in spinopelvic kinematics in sweep and scull ergometer rowing.
    Strahan AD; Burnett AF; Caneiro JP; Doyle MM; O'Sullivan PB; Goodman C
    Clin J Sport Med; 2011 Jul; 21(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 21562418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spinal and Pelvic Kinematics During Prolonged Rowing on an Ergometer vs. Indoor Tank Rowing.
    Trompeter K; Weerts J; Fett D; Firouzabadi A; Heinrich K; Schmidt H; Brüggemann GP; Platen P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Sep; 35(9):2622-2628. PubMed ID: 31373977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of foot-stretcher position and stroke rate on ergometer rowing kinematics.
    Engstrom I; Anderson K; Bez E; Agresta C; Telfer S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285676. PubMed ID: 37167317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Caution: the use of an electromagnetic device to measure trunk kinematics on rowing ergometers.
    Ng L; Burnett A; Campbell A; O'Sullivan P
    Sports Biomech; 2009 Sep; 8(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 19891203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinematic asymmetries of the lower limbs during ergometer rowing.
    Buckeridge E; Hislop S; Bull A; McGregor A
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Nov; 44(11):2147-53. PubMed ID: 22677926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A kinematic comparison of ergometer and on-water rowing.
    Lamb DH
    Am J Sports Med; 1989; 17(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 2729487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of electromyography and stroke kinematics during ergometer and on-water rowing.
    Fleming N; Donne B; Mahony N
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(12):1127-38. PubMed ID: 24576175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The mechanical rower: Construction, validity, and reliability of a test rig for wind braked rowing ergometers.
    Mentz L; Engleder T; Schulz G; Winkert K; Steinacker JM; Treff G
    J Biomech; 2020 Jun; 106():109833. PubMed ID: 32517994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of power output during rowing changes with ergometer type and race distance.
    Soper C; Hume PA
    Sports Biomech; 2004 Jul; 3(2):237-48. PubMed ID: 15552583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of anaerobic capacity in rowers using Wingate test on cycle and rowing ergometer.
    Klasnja A; Barak O; Popadić-Gaćesa J; Drapsin M; Knezević A; Grujić N
    Med Pregl; 2010; 63(9-10):620-3. PubMed ID: 21443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physiological responses to exercise on different models of the concept II rowing ergometer.
    Vogler AJ; Rice AJ; Withers RT
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2007 Dec; 2(4):360-70. PubMed ID: 19171954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of ergometer design on hip and trunk muscle activity patterns in elite rowers: an electromyographic assessment.
    Nowicky AV; Horne S; Burdett R
    J Sports Sci Med; 2005 Mar; 4(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 24431957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Body Motion and Rowing Performance: Association between Hip Angle and Rowing Performance: A Pilot Study.
    Fumoto M; Sera Y; Azuma K; Sato K; Matsumoto H
    Keio J Med; 2020 Sep; 69(3):66-75. PubMed ID: 31969524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.