These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2419888)

  • 1. The influence of staining techniques and examiners on evaluation of the morphology of fowl spermatozoa.
    Bilgili SF; Renden JA; Sexton KJ
    Poult Sci; 1985 Dec; 64(12):2358-61. PubMed ID: 2419888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of evaluation of rooster sperm morphology using different staining methods.
    Lukaszewicz E; Jerysz A; Partyka A; Siudzińska A
    Res Vet Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(3):583-8. PubMed ID: 18486956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of wet fixation, staining techniques, and storage time on bull sperm morphology.
    Sekoni VO; Gustafsson BK; Mather EC
    Nord Vet Med; 1981; 33(4-5):161-6. PubMed ID: 6172775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous determination of human sperm morphology and viability: simple office technique.
    Emilson LB; Dougherty KA; Cockett AT; Urry RL
    Urology; 1978 May; 11(5):488-91. PubMed ID: 79262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sperm membrane integrity in fresh and frozen-thawed canine semen samples: a comparison of vital stains with the NucleoCounter SP-100.
    Daub L; Geyer A; Reese S; Braun J; Otzdorff C
    Theriogenology; 2016 Jul; 86(2):651-6. PubMed ID: 27020876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of stains and investigators on assessment of morphology of canine spermatozoa.
    Root Kustritz MV; Olson PN; Johnston SD; Root TK
    J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 1998; 34(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 9657169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of two staining methods for identification of spermatozoon structure in roosters.
    Andraszek K; Banaszewska D; Biesiada-Drzazga B
    Poult Sci; 2018 Jul; 97(7):2575-2581. PubMed ID: 29617901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of assessment of pigeon sperm viability by contrast-phase microscope (eosin-nigrosin staining) and flow cytometry (SYBR-14/propidium iodide (PI) staining) [evaluation of pigeon sperm viability].
    Klimowicz-Bodys MD; Batkowski F; Ochrem AS; Savič MA
    Theriogenology; 2012 Feb; 77(3):628-35. PubMed ID: 22056017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of staining method and clinician experience on the evaluation of stallion sperm morphology.
    Murcia-Robayo RY; Jouanisson E; Beauchamp G; Diaw M
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2018 Jan; 188():165-169. PubMed ID: 29198956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sperm morphology: unstained and stained smears in fertile and infertile men.
    Ali JI; Grimes EM
    Arch Androl; 1989; 22(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 2474268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of human sperm morphology by strict criteria: comparison of wet preparation versus stained with the modified Diff-Quik method.
    Oral E; Yetis O; Elibol F; Senol H; Irez T; Aksu FM
    Arch Androl; 2002; 48(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 12137592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SpermBlue: a new universal stain for human and animal sperm which is also amenable to automated sperm morphology analysis.
    van der Horst G; Maree L
    Biotech Histochem; 2009 Dec; 84(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 19488904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of assessment of fowl sperm viability by eosin-nigrosin and dual fluorescence (SYBR-14/PI).
    Chalah T; Brillard JP
    Theriogenology; 1998 Aug; 50(3):487-93. PubMed ID: 10732141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sperm abnormalities in silver fox (Vulpes vulpes) semen selected for artificial insemination.
    Jalkanen L
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1993; 47():287-90. PubMed ID: 8229937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used.
    Maree L; du Plessis SS; Menkveld R; van der Horst G
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1369-82. PubMed ID: 20400771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semen collection and evaluation in the ram. The preparation of spermatozoa for morphological examination.
    Cameron RD
    Aust Vet J; 1977 Aug; 53(8):384-6. PubMed ID: 73371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection for sperm quality in White Plymouth rocks.
    Haye U; van Voorst A; Pit R
    Reprod Nutr Dev (1980); 1981; 21(6B):1067-75. PubMed ID: 7349568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of three staining methods for the morphological evaluation of human spermatozoa.
    Henkel R; Schreiber G; Sturmhoefel A; Hipler UC; Zermann DH; Menkveld R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):449-55. PubMed ID: 17601601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of acrosome on Papanicolaou-stained sperm and its relationship to the in vitro fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa.
    Jeyendran RS; Perez-Pelaez M; Van der Ven HH; Al-Hasani S; Rana N
    Arch Androl; 1986; 16(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 2427045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of sperm morphology in zebu bulls, under field conditions in the tropics.
    Chacón J
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2001 Apr; 36(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 11328562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.