These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24199329)

  • 1. Applying principles from safety science to improve child protection.
    Cull MJ; Rzepnicki TL; O'Day K; Epstein RA
    Child Welfare; 2013; 92(2):179-95. PubMed ID: 24199329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A collaborative and trauma-informed practice model for urban Indian child welfare.
    Lucero NM; Bussey M
    Child Welfare; 2012; 91(3):89-112. PubMed ID: 23444791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parent representation model in child safety conferences.
    Lalayants M
    Child Welfare; 2013; 92(5):107-36. PubMed ID: 24923137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The public health approach for understanding and preventing child maltreatment: a brief review of the literature and a call to action.
    Covington T
    Child Welfare; 2013; 92(2):21-39. PubMed ID: 24199321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and risk assessment frameworks: overview and implications for child maltreatment fatalities.
    Pecora PJ; Chahine Z; Graham JC
    Child Welfare; 2013; 92(2):143-60. PubMed ID: 24199327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: decision-making models.
    DePanfilis D; Scannapieco M
    Child Welfare; 1994; 73(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 8005017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Innovative cross-system and community approaches for the prevention of child maltreatment.
    DiLorenzo P; White CR; Morales A; Paul A; Shaw S
    Child Welfare; 2013; 92(2):161-78. PubMed ID: 24199328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision-making in child protective services: a comparison of selected risk-assessment systems.
    Doueck HJ; English DJ; DePanfilis D; Moote GT
    Child Welfare; 1993; 72(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 8404248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extent and nature of child maltreatment-related fatalities: implications for policy and practice.
    Sheldon-Sherman J; Wilson D; Smith S
    Child Welfare; 2013; 92(2):41-58. PubMed ID: 24199322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Engaging families in child welfare services: an evidence-based approach to best practice.
    Dawson K; Berry M
    Child Welfare; 2002; 81(2):293-317. PubMed ID: 12014470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementing child mistreatment risk assessment systems: lessons from theory.
    DePanfilis D
    Adm Soc Work; 1996; 20(2):41-59. PubMed ID: 10158873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Innovations in child protective services inservice training: commitment to excellence.
    Miller J; Dore MM
    Child Welfare; 1991; 70(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 1889312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A typology of child protective service cases: design and implementation issues for social work administrators.
    Dattalo P
    Adm Soc Work; 1997; 21(2):55-75. PubMed ID: 10167672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methamphetamine and the changing face of child welfare: practice principles for child welfare workers.
    Connell-Carrick K
    Child Welfare; 2007; 86(3):125-44. PubMed ID: 17722684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding and addressing racial/ethnic disproportionality in the front end of the child welfare system.
    Osterling KL; D'Andrade A; Austin MJ
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):9-30. PubMed ID: 19064443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk and safety assessment in child welfare: instrument comparisons.
    D'Andrade A; Austin MJ; Benton A
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):31-56. PubMed ID: 19064444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overcoming hopelessness and social isolation: the ENGAGE model for working with neglecting families toward permanence.
    Petras DD; Massat CR; Essex EL
    Child Welfare; 2002; 81(2):225-48. PubMed ID: 12014467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential program evaluation model in child protection.
    Lalayants M
    Child Welfare; 2012; 91(4):9-40. PubMed ID: 23600171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of differential response and other factors on parent perceptions of child protection involvement.
    Merkel-Holguin L; Hollinshead DM; Hahn AE; Casillas KL; Fluke JD
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Jan; 39():18-31. PubMed ID: 25499559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A fragmented patient safety concept: the structure and culture of safety management in healthcare.
    Goodman GR
    Hosp Top; 2003; 81(2):22-9. PubMed ID: 14719747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.