These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24199656)

  • 1. Auto-adaptive robot-aided therapy using machine learning techniques.
    Badesa FJ; Morales R; Garcia-Aracil N; Sabater JM; Casals A; Zollo L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 24199656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stochastic estimation of arm mechanical impedance during robotic stroke rehabilitation.
    Palazzolo JJ; Ferraro M; Krebs HI; Lynch D; Volpe BT; Hogan N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Mar; 15(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 17436881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment.
    Sanchez RJ; Liu J; Rao S; Shah P; Smith R; Rahman T; Cramer SC; Bobrow JE; Reinkensmeyer DJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):378-89. PubMed ID: 17009498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual reality and robotics for stroke rehabilitation: where do we go from here?
    Wade E; Winstein CJ
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2011; 18(6):685-700. PubMed ID: 22436307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental results using force-feedback cueing in robot-assisted stroke therapy.
    Johnson MJ; Van der Loos HF; Burgar CG; Shor P; Leifer LJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):335-48. PubMed ID: 16200757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke.
    Mirelman A; Bonato P; Deutsch JE
    Stroke; 2009 Jan; 40(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 18988916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 17626223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct interaction with an assistive robot for individuals with chronic stroke.
    Kmetz B; Markham H; Brewer BR
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1264-7. PubMed ID: 22254546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of visual error augmentation when integrated with assist-as-needed training method in robot-assisted rehabilitation.
    Wang F; Barkana DE; Sarkar N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Oct; 18(5):571-9. PubMed ID: 20639181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative evaluation of motor functional recovery process in chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted wrist training.
    Hu XL; Tong KY; Song R; Zheng XJ; Lui KH; Leung WW; Ng S; Au-Yeung SS
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):639-50. PubMed ID: 18490177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical treatment.
    Fischer H; Barbas J; Kahn L
    Rehab Manag; 2005 Oct; 18(8):24, 26-30. PubMed ID: 16231676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of robot-assisted bimanual movements on upper limb motor coordination following stroke.
    Lewis GN; Perreault EJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2009 Dec; 17(6):595-604. PubMed ID: 19666342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptability of robotic technology in neuro-rehabilitation: preliminary results on chronic stroke patients.
    Mazzoleni S; Turchetti G; Palla I; Posteraro F; Dario P
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 24461799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Customized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG-triggered therapy.
    Dipietro L; Ferraro M; Palazzolo JJ; Krebs HI; Volpe BT; Hogan N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 16200756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a robotic device for the rehabilitation of severe upper limb paresis in subacute stroke: exploration of patient/robot interactions and the motor recovery process.
    Duret C; Courtial O; Grosmaire AG; Hutin E
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():482389. PubMed ID: 25821804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device: a randomized clinical trial.
    Barker RN; Brauer SG; Carson RG
    Stroke; 2008 Jun; 39(6):1800-7. PubMed ID: 18403742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis.
    Housman SJ; Scott KM; Reinkensmeyer DJ
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Jun; 23(5):505-14. PubMed ID: 19237734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the ROM of wrist movements in stroke patients by means of a haptic wrist robot.
    Squeri V; Masia L; Taverna L; Morasso P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():2077-80. PubMed ID: 22254746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function.
    Balasubramanian S; Klein J; Burdet E
    Curr Opin Neurol; 2010 Dec; 23(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 20852421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.