BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24200412)

  • 1. Factor analysis of the North American Spine Society outcome assessment instrument: a study based on a spine registry of patients treated with lumbar and cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Aghayev E; Elfering A; Schizas C; Mannion AF;
    Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):916-24. PubMed ID: 24200412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking in the SWISSspine registry: results of 52 Dynardi lumbar total disc replacements compared with the data pool of 431 other lumbar disc prostheses.
    Aghayev E; Röder C; Zweig T; Etter C; Schwarzenbach O
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Dec; 19(12):2190-9. PubMed ID: 20711843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AY; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E3. PubMed ID: 29290130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects.
    Grob D; Porchet F; Kleinstück FS; Lattig F; Jeszenszky D; Luca A; Mutter U; Mannion AF
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 19882177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
    Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Optimized assessment of the outcome in patients with radicular back pain of the lumbar spine. The modified NASS questionnaire].
    Janousek M; Ferrari S; Schmid UD; Bischoff HA; Balsiger M; Theiler R
    Schmerz; 2011 Sep; 25(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 21938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
    Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses.
    Schluessmann E; Diel P; Aghayev E; Zweig T; Moulin P; Röder C;
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):851-61. PubMed ID: 19301042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck.
    Fankhauser CD; Mutter U; Aghayev E; Mannion AF
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jan; 21(1):101-14. PubMed ID: 21858567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Validation of the North American Spine Society Instrument for assessment of health status in patients with chronic backache].
    Pose B; Sangha O; Peters A; Wildner M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 10549122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The predictive value of the baseline Oswestry Disability Index in lumbar disc arthroplasty.
    Deutsch H
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E7. PubMed ID: 20568922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Course of Pain Intensity in Patients Undergoing Herniated Disc Surgery: A 5-Year Longitudinal Observational Study.
    Dorow M; Löbner M; Stein J; Pabst A; Konnopka A; Meisel HJ; Günther L; Meixensberger J; Stengler K; König HH; Riedel-Heller SG
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156647. PubMed ID: 27243810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Fekete TF; Haschtmann D; Kleinstück FS; Porchet F; Jeszenszky D; Mannion AF
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 26850172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials.
    Upadhyaya CD; Wu JC; Trost G; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Tay B; Coric D; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Mar; 16(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 22195608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Asher AL; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Parker SL; Bydon M; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 28498069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-life results of balloon kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures from the SWISSspine registry.
    Hübschle L; Borgström F; Olafsson G; Röder C; Moulin P; Popp AW; Külling F; Aghayev E;
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2063-77. PubMed ID: 24374285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.