234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24200989)
1. Proton radiography and proton computed tomography based on time-resolved dose measurements.
Testa M; Verburg JM; Rose M; Min CH; Tang S; Bentefour EH; Paganetti H; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):8215-33. PubMed ID: 24200989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast In Situ Image Reconstruction for Proton Radiography.
Ordoñez CE; Karonis NT; Duffin KL; Winans JR; DeJongh EA; DeJongh DF; Coutrakon G; Myers NF; Pankuch M; Welsh JS
J Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 8(2):185-198. PubMed ID: 33154789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of energy-resolved dose imaging technique in pencil beam scanning mode.
Alaka BG; Bentefour EH; Chirvase C; Samuel D; Teo BK
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Sep; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 35102004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of time-resolved proton radiography using x-ray flat-panel imaging system.
Jee KW; Zhang R; Bentefour EH; Doolan PJ; Cascio E; Sharp G; Flanz J; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1905-1919. PubMed ID: 28099164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement of single detector proton radiography by incorporating intensity of time-resolved dose rate functions.
Zhang R; Jee KW; Cascio E; Sharp GC; Flanz JB; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015030. PubMed ID: 29116055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A reconstruction approach for proton computed tomography by modeling the integral depth dose of the scanning proton pencil beam.
Chen X; Medrano M; Sun B; Hao Y; Reynoso FJ; Darafsheh A; Yang D; Zhang T; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2602-2620. PubMed ID: 35103331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT.
Piersimoni P; Faddegon BA; Méndez JR; Schulte RW; Volz L; Seco J
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3264-3274. PubMed ID: 29727481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MO-A-213AB-08: 2D Water Equivalent Path Length Imaging Technique for Pre-Treatment Range Verification in Proton Therapy.
Testa M; Bentefour H; Rose M; Paganetti H; Lu H
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part20):3860. PubMed ID: 28517525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of an in-vivo proton beam range check method in an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom using dose measurements.
Bentefour el H; Tang S; Cascio EW; Testa M; Samuel D; Prieels D; Gottschalk B; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1936-47. PubMed ID: 25832084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel scintillation detector design and performance for proton radiography and computed tomography.
Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Hurley RF; Johnson RP; Sadrozinski HF; Zatserklyaniy A; Plautz T; Giacometti V
Med Phys; 2016 Feb; 43(2):664-74. PubMed ID: 26843230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flat-panel imager energy-dependent proton radiography for a proton pencil-beam scanning system.
Harms J; Maloney L; Sohn JJ; Erickson A; Lin Y; Zhang R
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 65(14):145001. PubMed ID: 32498053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental comparison of relative stopping power evaluation between proton CT and x-ray CT for pre-clinical proton irradiation studies of small animals.
Terakawa A; Hosokawa H; Nogami M; Hitomi K; Ishii K
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 37011626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental fluence-modulated proton computed tomography by pencil beam scanning.
Dedes G; Johnson RP; Pankuch M; Detrich N; Pols WMA; Rit S; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3287-3296. PubMed ID: 29786862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concept of proton radiography using energy resolved dose measurement.
Bentefour el H; Schnuerer R; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):N386-93. PubMed ID: 27435446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical note: Flat panel proton radiography with a patient specific imaging field for accurate WEPL assessment.
Seller Oria C; Free J; Marmitt GG; Knäusl B; Brandenburg S; Knopf AC; Meijers A; Langendijk JA; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1756-1765. PubMed ID: 36629844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility study of a proton CT system based on 4D-tracking and residual energy determination via time-of-flight.
Ulrich-Pur F; Bergauer T; Burker A; Hirtl A; Irmler C; Kaser S; Pitters F; Rit S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Apr; 67(9):. PubMed ID: 35354129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing calibration settings for accurate water equivalent path length assessment using flat panel proton radiography.
Seller Oria C; Marmitt GG; Free J; Langendijk JA; Both S; Knopf AC; Meijers A
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Oct; 66(21):. PubMed ID: 34598170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A single detector energy-resolved proton radiography system: a proof of principle study by Monte Carlo simulations.
Huo W; Zwart T; Cooley J; Huang K; Finley C; Jee KW; Sharp GC; Rosenthal S; Xu XG; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025016. PubMed ID: 30561376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the impact of a scanner prototype on proton CT and helium CT image quality and dose efficiency with Monte Carlo simulation.
Götz S; Dickmann J; Rit S; Krah N; Khellaf F; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Dedes G; Landry G
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35086073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
