160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24201463)
1. A contemporary Fischer-Maibach investigation: variations in patch test delivery systems and implications for standardization.
Hamann D; Hamann CR; Hamann C
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(6):302-12. PubMed ID: 24201463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monitoring contact sensitization to p-phenylenediamine (PPD) by patch testing with PPD 0.3% in petrolatum.
Geier J; Ballmer-Weber BK; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Bircher A; Weisshaar E; Hillen U
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Jul; 69(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23782355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing.
Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17441852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Towards a perfect vehicle(s) for diagnostic patch testing: an overview.
Chiang A; Maibach HI
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2013 Mar; 32(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 22667342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose per unit area - a study of elicitation of nickel allergy.
Fischer LA; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17441846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patch testing with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 200 ppm aq. detects significantly more contact allergy than 100 ppm. A multicentre study within the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Andersen KE; Gonçalo M; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Maibach HI; Rustemeyer T; Le Coz CJ; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Jul; 71(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 24712418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 'Calibration' of our patch test reading technique is necessary.
Svedman C; Isaksson M; Björk J; Mowitz M; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66(4):180-7. PubMed ID: 22404193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reaction index and positivity ratio revisited.
Andersen KE; Andersen F
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jan; 58(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18154555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Augmentation of skin response by exposure to a combination of allergens and irritants - a review.
Pedersen LK; Johansen JD; Held E; Agner T
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 15209808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010).
Wentworth AB; Yiannias JA; Keeling JH; Hall MR; Camilleri MJ; Drage LA; Torgerson RR; Fett DD; Prakash AV; Scalf LA; Allen EM; Johnson JS; Singh N; Nordberg Linehan DL; Killian JM; Davis MD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 70(2):269-75.e4. PubMed ID: 24268786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can methylisothiazolinone be patch tested in petrolatum?
Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Apr; 70(4):240-2. PubMed ID: 24628347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis.
Keir J; English J; Fergie N
J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 19138454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity of petrolatum and aqueous vehicles for detecting allergy to imidazolidinylurea, diazolidinylurea, and DMDM hydantoin: a retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group.
Rietschel RL; Warshaw EM; Sasseville D; Fowler JF; DeLeo VA; Belsito DV; Taylor JS; Storrs FJ; Mathias CG; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Zug KA; Pratt M;
Dermatitis; 2007 Sep; 18(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 17725923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are contact allergens stable in patch test preparations? Investigation of the degradation of d-limonene hydroperoxides in petrolatum.
Nilsson U; Magnusson K; Karlberg O; Karlberg AT
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Mar; 40(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 10073439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stability of fragrance patch test preparations applied in test chambers.
Mowitz M; Zimerson E; Svedman C; Bruze M
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):822-7. PubMed ID: 22803625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromoglutaronitrile.
Bruze M; Gruvberger B; Goossens A; Hindsén M; Pontén A
Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 16(2):80-6, quiz 55-6. PubMed ID: 16036118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.
Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Jun; 14(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 14749021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variation in the amount of petrolatum preparation applied at patch testing.
Bruze M; Frick-Engfeldt M; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jan; 56(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 17177708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral prednisone suppresses allergic but not irritant patch test reactions in individuals hypersensitive to nickel.
Anveden I; Lindberg M; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Isaksson M; Liden C; Sommerlund M; Wahlberg JE; Wilkinson JD; Willis CM
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 15209811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
