137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24202408)
1. Minimal invasive and computer-assisted total knee replacement compared with the minimal invasive technique: a prospective, randomized trial with short-term outcomes.
Zhang Z; Gu B; Zhu W; Zhu L; Li Q; Du Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jan; 134(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 24202408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superior alignment but no difference in clinical outcome after minimally invasive computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MICA-UKA).
Zhang Z; Zhu W; Zhu L; Du Y
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3419-3424. PubMed ID: 25423875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study.
Zhang Z; Gu B; Zhu W; Zhu L; Li Q; Du Y
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Dec; 24(8):1475-9. PubMed ID: 24052416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) - A population matched study.
Khakha RS; Chowdhry M; Norris M; Kheiran A; Patel N; Chauhan SK
Knee; 2014 Oct; 21(5):944-8. PubMed ID: 25086899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective non-randomized comparative clinical outcome of computer assisted total knee arthroplasty with and without a minimally invasive approach.
Leelasestaporn C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Sep; 94(9):1089-95. PubMed ID: 21970198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Ishida K; Matsumoto T; Tsumura N; Kubo S; Kitagawa A; Chin T; Iguchi T; Kurosaka M; Kuroda R
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2011 Jul; 19(7):1107-12. PubMed ID: 21234541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?
Confalonieri N; Manzotti A; Pullen C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():63-7. PubMed ID: 17589366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Thiengwittayaporn S; Junsee D; Tanavalee A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S27-32. PubMed ID: 20120662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Lo NN; Chia KU; Chong HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 18171951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial.
Feczko P; Engelmann L; Arts JJ; Campbell D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():19. PubMed ID: 26762175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The advantages of computer assistance in total knee arthroplasty.
Bar MC; Daubresse F; Hugon S
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2011; 45(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 21765232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study.
Zhang Z; Zhu W; Gu B; Zhu L; Chen C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Mar; 133(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 23229457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective 9-Year Follow-Up.
Zhu M; Ang CL; Yeo SJ; Lo NN; Chia SL; Chong HC
J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):1000-4. PubMed ID: 26725133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.
Zhang GQ; Chen JY; Chai W; Liu M; Wang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1190-6. PubMed ID: 21776571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive imageless computer-navigated knee surgery: initial results.
Chandrasekaran S; Molnar RB
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 18358385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three different tourniquet application strategies for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a prospective non-randomized clinical trial.
Huang ZY; Pei FX; Ma J; Yang J; Zhou ZK; Kang PD; Shen B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Apr; 134(4):561-70. PubMed ID: 24515866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive and standard total knee arthroplasty result in similar clinical outcomes at a minimum of five-year follow-up.
Unnanuntana A; Pornrattanamaneewong C; Mow CS
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Sep; 95 Suppl 9():S29-35. PubMed ID: 23326979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study on early period of recovery between minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty and minimally invasive surgery-quadriceps sparing total knee arthroplasty in Chinese patients.
Yu JK; Yu CL; Ao YF; Gong X; Wang YJ; Wang S; Xing X; Chen LX; Ju XD
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1353-7. PubMed ID: 18959108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
