These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24202712)
1. A prospective, randomized, controlled, trial comparing occult-scar incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and classic three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Zhang L; Sah B; Ma J; Shang C; Huang Z; Chen Y Surg Endosc; 2014 Apr; 28(4):1131-5. PubMed ID: 24202712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility prospective study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with suprapubic approach. Le Roy B; Fetche N; Buc E; Pereira B; Genty F; Antomarchi O; Gagnière J; Pezet D; Slim K J Visc Surg; 2016 Nov; 153(5):327-331. PubMed ID: 27118171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Zehetner J; Pelipad D; Darehzereshki A; Mason RJ; Lipham JC; Katkhouda N Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Jun; 23(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 23751985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with two incisions: an improved, feasible and safe technique with superior cosmetic outcomes. Xu Y; Wang A; Dai Q; Fang Z; Li Z J Int Med Res; 2020 Dec; 48(12):300060520980589. PubMed ID: 33351703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes. Cao ZG; Cai W; Qin MF; Zhao HZ; Yue P; Li Y Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Oct; 21(5):311-3. PubMed ID: 22002264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Poon CM; Chan KW; Lee DW; Chan KC; Ko CW; Cheung HY; Lee KW Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12874694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cosmesis and Body Image in Patients Undergoing Single-port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Multicenter Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (SPOCC-trial). Lurje G; Raptis DA; Steinemann DC; Amygdalos I; Kambakamba P; Petrowsky H; Lesurtel M; Zehnder A; Wyss R; Clavien PA; Breitenstein S Ann Surg; 2015 Nov; 262(5):728-34; discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 26583659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gall Bladder Polyps. Joong Choi C; Roh YH; Kim MC; Choi HJ; Kim YH; Jung GJ JSLS; 2015; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 26229419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. Pan MX; Jiang ZS; Cheng Y; Xu XP; Zhang Z; Qin JS; He GL; Xu TC; Zhou CJ; Liu HY; Gao Y World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 19(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 23372363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ma J; Cassera MA; Spaun GO; Hammill CW; Hansen PD; Aliabadi-Wahle S Ann Surg; 2011 Jul; 254(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 21494123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of miniport laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus standard port laparoscopic cholecystectomy on recovery of physical activity: a randomized trial. Alhashemi M; Almahroos M; Fiore JF; Kaneva P; Gutierrez JM; Neville A; Vassiliou MC; Fried GM; Feldman LS Surg Endosc; 2017 May; 31(5):2299-2309. PubMed ID: 27655375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Hao L; Liu M; Zhu H; Li Z Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Dec; 22(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 23238374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Sasaki A; Ogawa M; Tono C; Obara S; Hosoi N; Wakabayashi G Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Oct; 22(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 23047380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy : scarless cholecystectomy. Hong TH; You YK; Lee KH Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1393-7. PubMed ID: 19118436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curve of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): a preliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladder diseases. Qiu Z; Sun J; Pu Y; Jiang T; Cao J; Wu W World J Surg; 2011 Sep; 35(9):2092-101. PubMed ID: 21660626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Pietrabissa A; Pugliese L; Vinci A; Peri A; Tinozzi FP; Cavazzi E; Pellegrino E; Klersy C Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):3089-97. PubMed ID: 26497946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study. Christoffersen MW; Brandt E; Oehlenschläger J; Rosenberg J; Helgstrand F; Jørgensen LN; Bardram L; Bisgaard T Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3239-45. PubMed ID: 25612547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of quality of life, body image, and cosmesis. Sinan H; Saydam M; Demir P; Ozer MT; Demirbas S Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Apr; 22(4):521-526. PubMed ID: 30975957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Marks JM; Phillips MS; Tacchino R; Roberts K; Onders R; DeNoto G; Gecelter G; Rubach E; Rivas H; Islam A; Soper N; Paraskeva P; Rosemurgy A; Ross S; Shah S J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Jun; 216(6):1037-47; discussion 1047-8. PubMed ID: 23619321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]