These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24202901)

  • 1. The effects of cue-target uniqueness on cued recall performance.
    Stein B
    Mem Cognit; 1977 May; 5(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 24202901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing.
    Park H; Rugg MD
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 17652467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.
    Meltzer JA; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 15627581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 24548323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs.
    Gullick MM; Juhasz BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 18609409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct and indirect measures of intentional forgetting in children and adults: evidence for retrieval inhibition and reinstatement.
    Lehman EB; McKinley-Pace MJ; Wilson JA; Slavsky MD; Woodson ME
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Feb; 64(2):295-316. PubMed ID: 9120384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
    Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
    Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [An examination on the relationship between elaboration and to-be-elaborated items in human memory].
    Takahashi M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1987 Feb; 57(6):357-64. PubMed ID: 3613297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval inhibition in directed forgetting and posthypnotic amnesia.
    Basden BH; Basden DR; Coe WC; Decker S; Crutcher K
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1994 Jul; 42(3):184-203. PubMed ID: 8063460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implicit retrieval processes in cued recall: implications for aging effects in memory.
    Friedman D; Snodgrass JG; Ritter W
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Dec; 16(6):921-38. PubMed ID: 7890826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall.
    Steffens MC; Erdfelder E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Nov; 51(4):705-33. PubMed ID: 9854440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are independent probes truly independent?
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.
    Unsworth N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 19358013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of semantic and nonsemantic cued orienting tasks on associative clustering in free recall.
    Till RE; Diehl RL; Jenkins JJ
    Mem Cognit; 1975 Jan; 3(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 24203820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):433-62. PubMed ID: 17061694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words.
    Braun K; Rubin DC
    Memory; 1998 Jan; 6(1):37-65. PubMed ID: 9640432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.