These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Retrieval variability: sources and consequences. Miller RR; Kasprow WJ; Schachtman TR Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(2):145-218. PubMed ID: 2876652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A retrieval method of drug molecules based on graph collapsing]. Qu JW; Lv XQ; Liu ZM; Liao Y; Sun PH; Wang B; Tang Z Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):368-374. PubMed ID: 29643542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the role of item similarity in retrieval-induced forgetting. Bäuml KH; Hartinger A Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 11958725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning semantic and visual similarity for endomicroscopy video retrieval. Andre B; Vercauteren T; Buchner AM; Wallace MB; Ayache N IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Jun; 31(6):1276-88. PubMed ID: 22353403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of acoustic similarity on short-term auditory memory in the monkey. Scott BH; Mishkin M; Yin P Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():36-48. PubMed ID: 23376550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pupillary changes during encoding, storage, and retrieval of information. Gardner RM; Beltramo JS; Krinsky R Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Dec; 41(3):951-5. PubMed ID: 1215138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A boosting framework for visuality-preserving distance metric learning and its application to medical image retrieval. Yang L; Jin R; Mummert L; Sukthankar R; Goode A; Zheng B; Hoi SC; Satyanarayanan M IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2010 Jan; 32(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 19926897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating storage and retrieval processes of directed forgetting: A model-based approach. Rummel J; Marevic I; Kuhlmann BG J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1526-1543. PubMed ID: 26950491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term retention of pictures and words as a function of type of distraction and length of delay interval. Pellegrino JW; Siegel AW; Dhawan M Mem Cognit; 1976 Jan; 4(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 21286953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel similarity learning method via relative comparison for content-based medical image retrieval. Huang W; Zhang P; Wan M J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):850-65. PubMed ID: 23563792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate Approach Towards Efficiency of Searching Agents in Digital Libraries Using Keywords. Vijayalakshmi Yellepeddi ; Manimegalai P ; Sasidhar Babu Suvanam J Med Syst; 2019 May; 43(6):164. PubMed ID: 31044273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research on similarity measurement for texture image retrieval. Zhu Z; Zhao C; Hou Y PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45302. PubMed ID: 23049785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography. El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The myth of the encoding-retrieval match. Nairne JS Memory; 2002; 10(5-6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12396651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic distance learning for joint assessment of visual and semantic similarities within the framework of medical image retrieval. Baâzaoui A; Abderrahim M; Barhoumi W Comput Biol Med; 2020 Jul; 122():103833. PubMed ID: 32479347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]