396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24203687)
1. [Time-dependent confounding in the estimation of treatment effects in randomised trials with multimodal therapies--an illustration of the problem of time-dependent confounding by causal graphs].
Zietemann VD; Schuster T; Duell TH
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Jan; 77(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 24203687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection.
Williamson EJ; Aitken Z; Lawrie J; Dharmage SC; Burgess JA; Forbes AB
Respirology; 2014 Apr; 19(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24447391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness.
Greenland S; Mansournia MA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1101-10. PubMed ID: 25687168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Causal Inference in Medicine Part II. Directed acyclic graphs--a useful method for confounder selection, categorization of potential biases, and hypothesis specification].
Suzuki E; Komatsu H; Yorifuji T; Yamamoto E; Doi H; Tsuda T
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 64(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 19797848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Causal Diagrams: Pitfalls and Tips.
Suzuki E; Shinozaki T; Yamamoto E
J Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):153-162. PubMed ID: 32009103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) - the application of causal diagrams in epidemiology].
Schipf S; Knüppel S; Hardt J; Stang A
Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):888-92. PubMed ID: 22193898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
Hogan JW; Lancaster T
Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control.
Christenfeld NJ; Sloan RP; Carroll D; Greenland S
Psychosom Med; 2004; 66(6):868-75. PubMed ID: 15564351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulating from marginal structural models with time-dependent confounding.
Havercroft WG; Didelez V
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4190-206. PubMed ID: 22826156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias analysis of the instrumental variable estimator as an estimator of the average causal effect.
Chiba Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19879376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjusting for differential proportions of second-line treatment in cancer clinical trials. Part I: structural nested models and marginal structural models to test and estimate treatment arm effects.
Yamaguchi T; Ohashi Y
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(13):1991-2003. PubMed ID: 15211598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of statistical methods for analysing survival data in the presence of non-random compliance.
Odondi L; McNamee R
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2994-3003. PubMed ID: 20963732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Graphical presentation of confounding in directed acyclic graphs.
Suttorp MM; Siegerink B; Jager KJ; Zoccali C; Dekker FW
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Sep; 30(9):1418-23. PubMed ID: 25324358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?
Hernán MA; Robins JM
Epidemiology; 2006 Jul; 17(4):360-72. PubMed ID: 16755261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
