BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2420563)

  • 1. Binaural interaction in the auditory middle latency response of the guinea pig.
    Ozdamar O; Kraus N; Grossmann J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 63(5):476-83. PubMed ID: 2420563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binaural stimulation reveals functional differences between midline and temporal components of the middle latency response in guinea pigs.
    Littman T; Kraus N; McGee T; Nicol T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 84(4):362-72. PubMed ID: 1378006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of brain stem auditory evoked potentials for monaural and binaural stimuli.
    Ainslie PJ; Boston JR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Aug; 49(3-4):291-302. PubMed ID: 6158405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamics of the contralateral white noise-induced enhancement in the guinea pig's middle latency response.
    Goksoy C; Demirtas S; Ungan P
    Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 1017(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 15261100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Click spatial position influences middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MAEPs) in humans.
    Woods DL; Clayworth CC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1985 Feb; 60(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 2578363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural interaction component and white-noise enhancement in middle latency responses: differential effects of anaesthesia in guinea pigs.
    Goksoy C; Utkucal R
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Feb; 130(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 10706439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of sleep on binaural interaction in auditory brainstem response and middle latency response.
    Suzuki T; Kobayashi K; Aoki K; Umegaki Y
    Audiology; 1992; 31(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 1554330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of stimulus level and frequency on ABR and MLR binaural interaction in human neonates.
    Cone-Wesson B; Ma E; Fowler CG
    Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):163-78. PubMed ID: 9112116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of the efferent medial olivocochlear system in contralateral masking and binaural interactions: an electrophysiological study in guinea pigs.
    Aran JM; Pajor AM; de Sauvage RC; Erre JP
    Audiology; 2000; 39(6):311-21. PubMed ID: 11766691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of continuous conditioning noise and light on the auditory- and visual-evoked potentials of the guinea pig.
    Goksoy C; Demirtas S; Ates K
    Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 1061(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16226728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity of the auditory middle latency response of the guinea pig to interaural level and time differences.
    Furukawa S; Maki K
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):48-57. PubMed ID: 16324809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural interaction in human auditory evoked potentials.
    Dobie RA; Norton SJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Aug; 49(3-4):303-13. PubMed ID: 6158406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binaural interaction in brainstem auditory evoked potentials elicited by frequency-specific stimuli.
    Ito S; Hoke M; Pantev C; Lütkenhöner B
    Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 35(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 3182413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of binaural auditory brainstem responses and the binaural difference potential evoked by chirps and clicks.
    Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2002 Jul; 169(1-2):85-96. PubMed ID: 12121742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory time-intensity cues in the binaural interaction component of the auditory evoked potentials.
    McPherson DL; Starr A
    Hear Res; 1995 Sep; 89(1-2):162-71. PubMed ID: 8600122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of binaural interaction by the characteristics of short-latency auditory evoked potentials in guinea pigs].
    Chudnovskiĭ SI; Moroz BS; Poliakov AN
    Neirofiziologiia; 1987; 19(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 3447058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Memory-dependent auditory evoked potentials to change in the binaural interaction of noise signals.
    Jones SJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 1716565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig].
    Dum N; von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Dec; 63(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 6521594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.