BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2420573)

  • 1. Unrecognized errors due to analog filtering of the brain-stem auditory evoked response.
    Janssen R; Benignus VA; Grimes LM; Dyer RS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 2420573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Ainslie PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6153356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Apr; 51(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 6164544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analog and zero phase-shift digital filtering of the auditory brain stem response waveform.
    Domico WD; Kavanagh KT
    Ear Hear; 1986 Dec; 7(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 3792680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short latency somatosensory and spinal evoked potentials: power spectra and comparison between high pass analog and digital filter.
    Maccabee PJ; Hassan NF; Cracco RQ; Schiff JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 2420570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT; Franks R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A digital filter for brain stem evoked responses.
    Møller AR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1980 Nov; 1(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 7457758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain stem auditory evoked response development in the kitten.
    Shipley C; Buchwald JS; Norman R; Guthrie D
    Brain Res; 1980 Jan; 182(2):313-26. PubMed ID: 7357388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential in the rat.
    Shaw NA
    Exp Brain Res; 1987; 65(3):686-90. PubMed ID: 3556497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering.
    Svensson O; Almqvist B; Jönsson KE
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3589480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Filtering of neurophysiologic signals.
    Burgess RC
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():51-65. PubMed ID: 31277873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of high-pass filter frequency and slope on BAEP amplitude, latency and wave form.
    Elton M; Scherg M; Von Cramon D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 May; 57(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 6201344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The brainstem auditory evoked potential: effects of high frequency filtering.
    Shaw NA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 2351091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital inverse filtering of distorted auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 7323677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion of the middle latency auditory response produced by analog filtering.
    Scherg M
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 7178804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain-stem auditory evoked responses as indicators of early brain insult.
    Karmel BZ; Gardner JM; Zappulla RA; Magnano CL; Brown EG
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(6):429-42. PubMed ID: 2460324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of analog filtering on brain stem auditory-evoked potentials in dogs.
    Kawasaki Y; Inada S
    Am J Vet Res; 1992 Jul; 53(7):1096-100. PubMed ID: 1497176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of finite impulse response digital filters to auditory brain-stem evoked potentials.
    Urbach D; Pratt H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Sep; 64(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 2427321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.