These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2420573)

  • 21. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Frequency spectra and filtering of the early auditory evoked potential].
    Tietze G; Kevanishvili Z
    HNO; 1990 Nov; 38(11):399-407. PubMed ID: 2289897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of click polarity on the brain-stem auditory evoked response (BAER) revisited.
    Schwartz DM; Morris MD; Spydell JD; Ten Brink C; Grim MA; Schwartz JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(6):445-57. PubMed ID: 1701707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2526-36. PubMed ID: 2745877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of hypothermia on the cat brain-stem auditory evoked response.
    Rossi GT; Britt RH
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 6198155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of zero-phase digital filters to enhance brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs).
    Møller AR
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 2451604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time- and intensity-dependent low-pass filtering of auditory brain stem responses.
    Hoke M; Wickesberg RE; Lütkenhöner B
    Audiology; 1984; 23(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 6721790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving brain stem auditory evoked potential recordings by digital filtering.
    Møller AR
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 6840414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials using dynamic time warping.
    Picton T; Hunt M; Mowrey R; Rodriguez R; Maru J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 2451603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Highpass filtering of auditory evoked brain stem potentials (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J; Althaus V
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 7295174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: a comparison of two high-frequency filter settings.
    Cacace AT; Shy M; Satya-Murti S
    Neurology; 1980 Jul; 30(7 Pt 1):765-7. PubMed ID: 7190242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The brain-stem auditory-evoked response in the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) to clicks and frequency-modulated sweeps.
    Burkard R; Moss CF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):801-10. PubMed ID: 7930082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. High pass digital and analog filtering of the middle latency response.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD
    Ear Hear; 1987 Apr; 8(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 3582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Brainstem auditory evoked responses elicited by tone-burst stimuli in clinically normal dogs.
    Uzuka Y; Fukaki M; Hara Y; Matsumoto H
    J Vet Intern Med; 1998; 12(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9503356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cross-correlation and latency compensation analysis of click-evoked and frequency-following brain-stem responses in man.
    Galbraith GC; Brown WS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 1695141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal digital filters for analyzing the mid-latency auditory P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Liljander S; Holm A; Keski-Säntti P; Partanen JV
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jun; 266():50-67. PubMed ID: 27015794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of high dose sodium thiopental on brain stem auditory and median nerve somatosensory evoked responses in humans.
    Drummond JC; Todd MM; U HS
    Anesthesiology; 1985 Sep; 63(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 4025886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Classification of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials by syntactic methods.
    Madhavan GP; De Bruin H; Upton AR; Jernigan ME
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Jul; 65(4):289-96. PubMed ID: 2424741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory brainstem evoked responses and attention. Contribution to a controversial subject.
    Collet L; Duclaux R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1986; 101(5-6):439-41. PubMed ID: 3727978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of interwave latencies of brain stem auditory evoked responses in narcoleptics, primary insomniacs and normal controls.
    Hellekson C; Allen A; Greeley H; Emery S; Reeves A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Dec; 47(6):742-4. PubMed ID: 91504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.